Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

majority shareholder

Read a random definition: nasciturus

A quick definition of majority shareholder:

A majority shareholder is someone who owns or controls more than half of a company's stock. This means they have a lot of power and influence over the company's decisions. On the other hand, a minority shareholder owns less than half of the company's stock and cannot control the company's management or elect directors on their own. There are also dummy shareholders who own stock in name only for the benefit of the true owner, and controlling shareholders who have a significant number of shares that are widely distributed among many others.

A more thorough explanation:

A majority shareholder is a person or entity that owns or controls more than half of the total shares of a corporation. This means that they have a significant amount of power and influence over the company's decisions and operations.

For example, if a corporation has 100 shares of stock outstanding, a majority shareholder would own 51 or more of those shares. This gives them the ability to elect the board of directors and make other important decisions that affect the company.

On the other hand, a minority shareholder owns less than half of the total shares and does not have the same level of control or influence over the company. They may still have a voice in certain decisions, but they cannot make decisions on their own.

Overall, the majority shareholder plays a crucial role in the governance of a corporation and can have a significant impact on its success or failure.

majority rule | majority verdict

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
Nostradumbass
23:21
Hi new here I’m the oracular spectacular
23:53
Hi there, I am also new here.
tysm!!!
8:49
feels like the first day of class in here
What's the consensus on writing 'Why X' statements?
Is it always helpful or can it be harmful if there's no clear message sent?
can be harmful if you regurgitate their website to them
Why X can be helpful if you write a compelling reason
Anybody else think UGA will send a wave tomorrow?
14:52
What makes you think that? They said 6-8 weeks did they not
14:54
last couple years, first wave has been mid september. Last year they sent decisions on mondays and the first one was 9/18 and this year the same monday is tomorrow
14:58
Oh damn okok. I'm Canadian so I haven't been in the loop with American cycles, mainly just Canadians. Fingers crossed for those who applied!
14:58
When does second wave hit? Mine currently says its in review
15:07
Last year they sent decisions two Mondays in a row then took two weeks off. You never really know because they could change year to year what they do
15:09
some applications get a really quick turnaround and some have to wait the 6-8 weeks
15:11
Whenever I had a why X law school, I wrote maybe half a page just saying I like the location, I like the programs offered, and I like how the alumni helps each other. Did not waste their time but let them know I didn't really think they were special.
15:13
I mean, none of these schools are special. All they are is another way for boomers to steal from the youth and fuck over society before the party ends on their pathetic ignorant lives of pure consumption.
um ok
in my bag now in my bag now
whats up glove
yo spidey
aj brown out tm night
hows temple
Jordan love going down hurting my fastasy team bad and will Levis selling
i mean its alright idk school is school
levis the boy
rip his GF lol
Manifesting people don’t show up to UW orientation tomorrow and they let me in off the WL. Wish me luck folks.
They keep trying to kill trump lol
I know. It’s really sad that people can’t just agree to disagree, but this isn’t a new problem. People have always been angry, crazy, and violent, we just hear about quicker. Y’all stay safe out there and be nice to someone today 🫡❤️
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.