Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

make-whole doctrine

Read a random definition: inter alia

A quick definition of make-whole doctrine:

The make-whole doctrine is a rule in insurance that says the insurance company cannot keep any of the money from a claim settlement unless the settlement amount is more than what is needed to fully compensate the person who suffered the loss. This means that the insured person should receive all the money they are entitled to before the insurance company can take any of it.

A more thorough explanation:

The make-whole doctrine is a principle in insurance that states that an insurer will not receive any of the proceeds from the settlement of a claim, unless the insurance policy provides otherwise. This means that the insured will be fully compensated for their loss before the insurer can receive any funds.

For example, let's say that John has a car insurance policy with a $10,000 limit for damages. If John gets into an accident and the damages cost $8,000 to repair, the insurer will pay the full $8,000 to John to cover the cost of the damages. However, if the damages cost $12,000 to repair, the insurer will pay the full $10,000 limit of the policy, and John will have to pay the remaining $2,000 out of pocket.

The make-whole doctrine ensures that the insured is fully compensated for their loss before the insurer can receive any funds. This protects the insured from being undercompensated for their loss.

makeup gas | mal

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 7 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
Remember when Elon musk literally did the nazi salute twice , yeah
Insane
his goal is to crush public opinion of the government by intentionally making ineffective and then pointing to how ineffective it is
Dkk
17:05
I personally think most people are one issue voters and rhey disagree on principle but things have to be done this say now or else they never will.
17:05
oh well should be a good little 'societal experiment' if u will
@SplitterusClitterus: he clearly just meant his heart goes out to him, just ignore his support for the literal fascist party in germany
17:06
dkk what's your one issue
texaslawhopefully
17:06
I was a one issue voter. My one fucking issue was that Trump encouraged an insurrection.
texaslawhopefully
17:07
That's all anyone should've needed.
17:07
i am a 1 issue voter: national debt.
jackfrost11770
17:07
THERES A COP FUNERAL AND NOW THE BUSES ARENT RUNNING TO MY PLACE SO I HAVE TO WALK IN THE FREEZING COLD HOME
texaslawhopefully
17:07
Not to mention that he's completely thrown away liberalism and classic western political philosophy, but yk your eggs will be cheaper so it's worth it
how bad are these tariffs gonna get for us everyday consumers?
@jackfrost11770: FUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUu
jackfrost11770
17:08
FUCK THE NYPD
WASP HAHAHAHAHHA
texaslawhopefully
17:08
Estimates are about 4k fruitbat
YRDSL
17:08
im a 1 issue voter - if i want someone to be elected i vote for them
woof
texaslawhopefully
17:08
I've seen some that could be as high as 7k though
17:08
@jackfrost11770: ya prolly don't buy any lotto tickets tonite
get on that trump coin before the rug pull lol
Dkk
17:09
@BigStrongBug: I don't consider myself a one issue voter but if I had to pick one it would be gender relations.
i am a one issue voter for the economy, which is why i voted harris
texaslawhopefully
17:10
Here's a fairly well respected estimate fruitybat: The proposed tariffs could cost consumers an additional $2,500 to $7,600 a year per household, according to estimates, said Jonathan Gold, vice president of supply chain and customs policy for the National Retail Federation.
i am a voter so i voted
17:11
Lol what does gender relations mean
17:11
Like are you anti gay marriage?
texaslawhopefully
17:11
@Dkk: So you care about gender relations over the Constitution, institutional stability, the economy, political norms, etc.?
blue collar trump voters are gonna blame anything but him anyway when the price of their household consumption goes through the roof. I wonder how they'll spin that narrative.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.