Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

malapportionment

Read a random definition: Undue influence

A quick definition of malapportionment:

Malapportionment: When the way that a group of people is divided up into different voting districts is not fair or against the rules, it is called malapportionment. This means that some districts might have more or less people than others, which can make it harder for everyone's vote to count the same. It's like if you were playing a game and one team had more players than the other, it wouldn't be fair. Malapportionment can also be called gerrymandering or legislative districting.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: Malapportionment is when a legislative district is improperly or unconstitutionally divided. This means that the distribution of voters in a district is not fair or equal. It can happen when one district has significantly more voters than another district, which can lead to unequal representation in government.

Examples: For example, let's say that a state has two legislative districts. District A has 100,000 voters, while District B has only 50,000 voters. This means that District A has twice as many voters as District B, even though both districts have the same number of representatives. This is an example of malapportionment because the voters in District B have more representation than the voters in District A.

Another example of malapportionment is when a district is gerrymandered. Gerrymandering is when a district is drawn in a way that benefits one political party over another. This can lead to malapportionment because the voters in one district may have more influence over the outcome of an election than voters in another district.

Explanation: Malapportionment is a problem because it can lead to unequal representation in government. When one district has more voters than another district, the voters in the smaller district may not have as much influence over the outcome of an election. This means that their voices may not be heard as much as the voices of voters in the larger district. Malapportionment can also lead to unfair policies and laws being passed because the interests of one group of voters may be prioritized over another group of voters.

malandrinus | mala praxis

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
16:14
Justice as Fairness!
16:14
also wow I didn’t consider that about immigration policy. hmmm
16:17
@Law-Guy: you get it
16:19
@baddestbunny: oh yeah definitly. Idk how any system of government would work if you can't distribute social goods to everyone.
MildChiller
16:33
does anyone know if the Yale webinars are cameras on?
1a2b3c4d26z
16:35
Justice as deez!
17:49
Quentin Tarantino is interested in watching somebody’s ear getting cut off; David Lynch is interested in the ear.
18:03
Quentin Tarantino can't resist putting a gay scene with a black guy participating in the gay act in his movies.
18:05
David Lynch is just gay.
18:18
Lynch is more in touch with his unconscious/dream state than the average person
18:42
Probably. I just dont know. All I know is he did a good job with Dune.
18:45
You should watch Blue Velvet
18:46
How’s your LSAT studying been going?
18:49
It is good. I have about two more weeks and I broke the 90 level on LSAT Demon which is good last night. My goal is 95 so I can probably get it before I test. It is scaled our of 100. This is for LR. My RC is below that but I know the more I get better at MBT questions the better my RC becomes.
18:50
I watched the trailer for that movie. The run time is 2 hours. May watch it on 2x the speed. Just watched se7en and thats like as graphic as I get so I kinda need a break from weird bodyhorror stuff. The sloth guy in that movie scared me.
18:51
I do like psychological horror though.
18:53
Oh jesus don’t watch the movie at all if you’re gonna watch it on 2x speed
18:54
I have never used lsat demon; how do their levels relate to actual lsat scoring?
18:56
kinda go in 20 point intervals. 20 points if you have mastered lvl 1 difficulty questions, 100 points if you have mastered lvl 5.
18:56
Getting 100 points is incredibly difficult though. anything baout 95 is pushing the 175-180 range. 90-95 is like 170-174 or so. etc.
18:56
yeah but if you’re getting a 95 on all sections what LSAT score is that? how is that calculated?
18:56
oh okay
18:57
so 100 would be a 180?
18:57
Yeah, 100 is like you would get a 180 and there's nothing more to teach you. I have only seen someone with a 100 like 2/3 times.
18:57
are you taking practice tests that are being scored though?
18:57
or just drills
18:57
Yep, they get factored into it.
18:58
I do drilling essentially every day. A timed section every 3, and a test every 2 weeks.
1a2b3c4d26z
20:06
re: WashU's URM lsat differential - fair to chalk that up to LSAT redaction weirdness messing w the scale or are they generally starved for URMs
1a2b3c4d26z
20:07
And an (albeit negligible) inverse URM GPA differential
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.