Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

marital privilege

Read a random definition: shareholder voting agreement

A quick definition of marital privilege:

Marital privilege, also known as spousal privilege, is a legal rule that protects private conversations between married couples and prevents them from being used as evidence in court. There are two types of marital privilege: marital communications privilege and spousal testimonial privilege. Marital communications privilege means that conversations between spouses during their marriage are private and cannot be used in court. Spousal testimonial privilege means that a spouse cannot be forced to testify against their partner in a criminal case. However, there are exceptions to these privileges, such as if the communication is revealed to a third party or if one spouse is suing the other.

A more thorough explanation:

Marital privilege, also known as spousal privilege, is a legal concept that protects private spousal communications and prevents any testimony against a spouse from being used in court. There are two types of marital privileges: marital communications privilege and spousal testimonial privilege.

In both civil and criminal cases, communications made between spouses during the marriage are privileged if the communication is intended to be private and made in reliance on the sanctity of marriage. This privilege can be asserted even if the marriage is terminated because of divorce or the death of one spouse. In most jurisdictions, both spouses hold the privilege, and any party can assert it by refusing to testify about spousal privileged communications or by preventing the other party from doing so. However, some states rule that only communicating spouses can assert the privilege. The burden of proof is on the opposing party, who should prove that particular words and acts are not intended as private communication.

For example, if a husband and wife have a private conversation about their finances during their marriage, neither of them can be compelled to testify about that conversation in court if one of them is called as a witness.

In criminal cases, the spouse of a criminal defendant who is called as a witness by the prosecution may choose to testify but cannot be compelled to testify against his or her spouse about events that occurred before and during the marriage. While the privilege can be waived by the witness spouse, even if the defendant spouse objects. In a minority of jurisdictions, the defendant spouse holds the privilege to prevent the witness spouse from testifying, regardless of the witness spouse’s willingness.

For example, if a wife is called as a witness in a criminal trial against her husband, she cannot be forced to testify about any events that occurred during their marriage.

Marital privilege does not apply if the private communication is revealed to third parties, one spouse is suing the other, or when one spouse is charged with a crime against the other or their children. A judge must decide whether to recognize an exception to the marital privilege by giving judicial notice of legislative facts, which are policy facts related to legal reasoning and the lawmaking process.

For example, if a husband is charged with domestic violence against his wife, she can be compelled to testify against him in court.

marital misconduct | Marital Property

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
Can y'all help me understand something lol. What does it mean for an app to "go complete"? Is that when the school has reviewed it and made a decision?
13:35
Na, it's when they have all the required information
Gotcha. So what would be the difference between received and completed?
Does complete entail like the app + LORs?
13:35
correct
That makes sense. Thank you!
13:36
complete basically means they've acknowledged receipt and it's ready to go under review whenever they start the deliberative process
Quillinit
13:40
I still haven't had Chicago or Cornell go complete, but I think that's just how they be
13:41
when did you submit
CaringEquableGuppy
13:42
How do you know when an application is complete? Is it on LSAC or the school's portal?
13:43
it'll be on the school-specific portal
Quillinit
13:44
when they opened
Quillinit
13:45
they both say something along the lines of "received and waiting to be processed"
13:48
anyone have good resources for revising a personal statement for reuse after applying with it last cycle?
13:49
Any guesses when Cornell and Penn CRS fee waivers will go out?
13:51
@Quillinit: from my recollection, chicago and cornell collapse complete/UR1 into a single step, so they may simply not be ready to begin reviewing applications
13:52
i think it's fair to assume, barring a handful of schools like UVA, most schools won't begin reviewing applications in earnest until the beginning of next month at the earliest, so it wouldn't be surprising to hear that applications are just sitting in the queue
13:54
@oakenrays: I was just gonna write a new one personally but I think you want to make it recognizably different from your previous PS
13:56
@baddestbunny: definitely agree that some revision and additional information is warranted but, my why law is the same... I guess just tell the same story in a different way
14:03
ugh fineeee I'll write a new stupid essay
14:07
yeah I told my last essay about a formative experience and am trying to update it now to be about what I’ve learned since that experience
recently wrapped up interview
i re-wrote my PS this cycle when I reapplied
fire drill at work
so lit
Quillinit
15:10
oh fun @info-man, Chicago just changed to complete today, so we'll see
boglue
15:23
do you have to have lawhub advantage for the lsd status checker to work
lawhub kind of a freaky ass name now that i think about it
16:22
The reason why today’s Image-Fiction isn’t the rescue from a passive, addictive TV-psychology that it tries so hard to be is that most Image-Fiction writers render their material with the same tone of irony and self-consciousness that their ancestors, the literary insurgents of Beat and postmodernism, used so effectively to rebel against their own world and context. And the reason why this irreverent postmodern approach fails to help the new Imagists transfigure TV is simply that TV has beaten the new Imagists to the punch.
Quillinit
16:26
idk lsd status checker button hasn't worked for me this whole cycle so far
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.