Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

Mark Hopkins doctrine

Read a random definition: leges centuriatae

A quick definition of Mark Hopkins doctrine:

The Mark Hopkins doctrine is a rule that says if an employee quits their job because of a labor dispute, they can only get unemployment benefits if their next job is a real, permanent job. This means they can't just take a temporary job to get benefits. The rule comes from a court case called Mark Hopkins, Inc. v. Employment Comm'n.

A more thorough explanation:

The Mark Hopkins Doctrine is a principle that applies to unemployment benefits in cases where an employee leaves a job due to a labor dispute. According to this doctrine, if an employee leaves their job due to a labor dispute, any subsequent employment they have must be genuine and intended to be permanent in order to avoid disqualification from unemployment benefits if they leave that job as well.

For example, let's say that an employee leaves their job at a factory due to a labor dispute. They then find a new job at a different factory, but they don't like it and decide to quit after a few weeks. If the new job was not a genuine attempt at permanent employment, the employee may be disqualified from receiving unemployment benefits.

The Mark Hopkins Doctrine was established in the case of Mark Hopkins, Inc. v. Employment Comm'n, where the court ruled that an employee who left their job due to a labor dispute was not entitled to unemployment benefits if they left their subsequent job voluntarily and without good cause.

market value at the well | marking estoppel

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:12
@RoaldDahl: Likely not however it could mean nothing
RoaldDahl
16:15
So if it means nothing does that mean something?
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:17
Possibly
RoaldDahl
16:26
Cool
RoaldDahl
16:26
thank you!!!! i hope it means something
pinkandblue
16:31
fart
IrishDinosaur
16:36
Mich R gang lesgooo
Did anyone else get that random get to know nova email?
HopefullyInLawSchool
17:21
Ya it was sent to all YM applicants
starfishies
17:37
Anyone get the NDLS email inviting you to apply for something even though they haven’t made a decision on your app yet
17:38
Better yet I got the email and I was rejected last month
starfishies
17:38
Wtf
starfishies
17:39
and the deadline is in like a week what is this
any cardozo movement?
BatmanBeyond
18:01
Sent a LOCI via portal, but I'm wondering if email would have gotten me a swifter response
BatmanBeyond
18:02
This whole hold/wait-list/reserve system is a headache
loci already?
BatmanBeyond
18:09
If the odds are like 1-2% I don't think it matters much by the numbers
12:11
I got the same NDLS email
OrangeThing
12:18
I think the user profiles are broken
19:29
Any word out of Notre Dame?
19:29
Only the invitation to apply for LSE
19:29
Anyone received a decision from NDLS?
19:50
when did u guys apply that just heard from umich? they havent even glanced at my app yet
0:30
how am i supposed to spy on people when profile links are broken?
Right. Broken links smh
I've been UR since first/second week of Jan, no updates otherwise, is that a bad sign? At or above median LSAT and above 75th gpa.
The profile links are not working for me. anybody else?
13:18
i’m in the same boat mastermonkey but with lower stats. i hope i hear back by mid march
CheeseIsMyLoveLanguage
13:24
@mastermonkey45: Looking at some of the recent decisions in relation to when they went complete, I'd say it's a good sign. It seems many declines were sent within about 5-6 weeks of completion. Given those were applications that were SENT in January, I'd say that means you're still solidly in the running. :)
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.