Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

matching-acceptance rule

Read a random definition: fithwite

A quick definition of matching-acceptance rule:

Matching-Acceptance Rule: This is a rule that says when someone makes an offer to do something, the person who accepts the offer must agree to do exactly what was offered without changing anything. This is important because it helps make sure that both people understand what they are agreeing to and that there are no misunderstandings. In some cases, there are laws that say this rule must be followed, but in other cases, people can agree to change the terms of the offer if they want to.

A more thorough explanation:

The matching-acceptance rule, also known as the mirror-image rule, is a principle in contract law that states that the acceptance of an offer must be positive, unconditional, unequivocal, and unambiguous. This means that the terms of the acceptance must correspond exactly with those of the offer, and must not change, add to, or qualify the terms of the offer.

For example, if a seller offers to sell a car for $10,000, and the buyer responds by saying "I accept, but only if you include new tires," this would not be considered a valid acceptance under the matching-acceptance rule. The buyer's response changes the terms of the offer, and therefore does not match the original offer.

The purpose of the matching-acceptance rule is to ensure that both parties have a clear understanding of the terms of the contract, and to prevent misunderstandings or disputes that could arise if the terms of the acceptance differ from those of the offer.

matched order | matching principle

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
lilypadfrog
20:31
that seems crazy #tome
texaslawhopefully
20:32
No, at least from the two people I know there that’s false. I think it’s just something like Chicago for conservatives is on par with S whereas for liberals it’s below HYS but above CCNP
texaslawhopefully
20:32
I mean I think even the student body there only like 15 percent is part of fedsoc
It's more just not a good # for people who aren't willing to clerk conservative. I'm sure they place liberal clerks at an above average rate for a t-6 though. Maybe higher (not entirely sure)
texaslawhopefully
20:34
Page 14 has ideological splits by school: https://scholar.harvard.edu/files/msen/files/law-prof-ideology.pdf
texaslawhopefully
20:35
Chicago/UVA are more to the right but not by an exceedingly large difference
lilypadfrog
20:36
I feel like UVA doesn’t have that reputation the way Chicago does. That’s interesting. Thanks tex
yeah I've heard about uva being conservative
siroracle
20:48
Yeah it’s only 75 percent lib that’s pretty terrifying
Dkk
20:53
lmfao
20:59
@siroracle: funny cause true
@siroracle: don't you have a bridge to be under?
shouldn't you be collecting tolls
21:00
trolololol
atwatodbit
21:04
anyone know much about mich clerking
atwatodbit
21:05
ive tried to learn more about it but its hard to cut through stuff. numbers wise they look good?
21:06
this website is a good research tool for outcomes: https://app.lawhub.org/schools
atwatodbit
21:06
@llama: thanks!
21:06
yah
Dkk
21:10
Anyone else read the Antioch shooters manifesto today. Pretty crazy stuff.
21:14
sad
YRDSL
21:31
@texaslawhopefully: it's pretty funny how even in law journal articles people can't stop confusing Penn with Penn State
texaslawhopefully
21:40
lmfao I didn't even notice that
21:42
Yeah to penn Carey students I’m sure that is a
21:42
Those are fighting words
21:46
@Dkk: one of the most deranged documents i've ever had the displeasure of reading
lilypadfrog
22:03
sometimes I go into fight or flight mode until I get all my work done
i call that locking in
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.