Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

Mathews v. Eldridge test

Read a random definition: juxta ratam

A quick definition of Mathews v. Eldridge test:

The Mathews v. Eldridge test is a way to determine if an administrative procedure is fair. It looks at five things: how important the thing being affected is, how likely it is that the procedure will make a mistake, if adding more steps would help, what the government is trying to do, and how much it would cost to add more steps. This test helps make sure that people are treated fairly when the government makes decisions that affect them.

A more thorough explanation:

The Mathews v. Eldridge test is a principle used in constitutional law to determine whether an administrative procedure provides due-process protection. It involves analyzing several factors:

  1. The nature of the private interest that will be affected by the governmental action
  2. The risk of an erroneous deprivation through the procedure used
  3. The probable value of additional or substitute procedural safeguards
  4. The governmental function involved
  5. The administrative burden and expense that would be created by requiring additional or substitute procedural safeguards

This test was established in the case of Mathews v. Eldridge, which dealt with the termination of disability benefits by the Social Security Administration.

For example, let's say that a person's driver's license is suspended due to a traffic violation. The Mathews v. Eldridge test would be used to determine whether the administrative procedure used to suspend the license provided due-process protection.

  • The private interest affected is the person's ability to drive and travel freely.
  • The risk of an erroneous deprivation could be high if the traffic violation was incorrectly recorded or if the person was not given proper notice of the suspension.
  • Additional procedural safeguards could include a hearing or an appeals process.
  • The governmental function involved is regulating traffic and ensuring public safety.
  • The administrative burden and expense of additional procedural safeguards would depend on the specific procedures implemented.

By analyzing these factors, the court can determine whether the administrative procedure used to suspend the driver's license provided sufficient due-process protection.

mathematical-algorithm exception | matima

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
21:15
Feel like I can finally stop holding my breath!! Whew!!!
[] baddestbunny
22:16
every time I get accosted by a strange man who follows me around because my male coworkers were too busy talking to walk me back to my car I get closer to saying we need to bring back traditional gender roles
Dkk
22:32
Nice! @Macaque
Dkk
22:32
@Aromatic, Have to guess.
Dkk
22:33
That sucks @Bunny do you have to go to the hospital?
[] baddestbunny
22:40
I said accosted not assaulted
23:35
guys. my notre dame address just went long is this good or bad
1a2b3c4d26z
23:37
Oooooo me too
23:37
omg is this good or bad
Dkk
23:47
Idk if gender roles are gunna fix that then.
23:49
it looks like most people who applied in october last cycle didn't get a decision until january... does it even mean anything that our addresses went long??
hows ED 2 compared to ED 1?
Dkk
0:10
No idea
windyMagician
0:34
reporting live to say my ndls address also went long
does it mean anything ^
Dkk
2:21
NDLS and Fordham took a very long time last year. It's good info for people to know.
[] baddestbunny
4:29
let’s get after it boys and girls
Dkk
5:21
I gtg to bed soon.
Dkk
5:22
Big day today. Gunna be a crazy one. I will sleep through the first half.
good morning lsd it is 5 am EST
also jazzy my ndls address went long ages ago i sadly do not think it means anything
my stanford address also went long LOL i think at most it's an indicator it's under review
WorthlessAttractiveZombie
7:44
My berkeley paragraph finally disappeared. I definitely think it is just an indicator that they are actively reviewing files, and does not mean anything about A, WL, or Rs
WorthlessAttractiveZombie
7:46
Also has anyone's date disappeared for W&L? Mine did last night
7:55
@WorthlessAttractiveZombie: mine did yesterday morning
7:56
Oops sorry I meant Vilanova. Mine disappeared last week
soapy
8:48
UMN under review! As predicted, decisions are gonna come out early December
Minus those random R decisions from UMN yesterday though right? I wonder what happened there. I don’t think I’ve seen a school start the season out with anything but As on here
almost all of my apps have been UR for 6 weeks at this point I feel exhausted waiting for them to finish
Irvine is being snobby and wont start any review until end of Nov.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.