Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

merger of offenses

Read a random definition: eyre

A quick definition of merger of offenses:

Merger of offenses is when a person is charged with two crimes, but one of them is absorbed into the more serious offense. This means that the person cannot be convicted of both crimes and avoids being punished twice for the same thing. For example, if someone is charged with attempting to commit a crime and then actually committing the crime, they can only be convicted of the more serious offense. This rule does not apply to conspiracy and the completed crime.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: Merger of offenses is when a person is charged with two crimes, but one of the crimes is absorbed into the other. This means that the person cannot be punished for both crimes. For example, if someone is charged with attempted robbery and robbery, they can only be punished for the more serious crime of robbery. This is to prevent double jeopardy, which is when someone is punished twice for the same crime. Example: John is charged with both assault and battery. However, the court decides that the assault charge is a lesser included offense of battery, so the assault charge is merged into the battery charge. This means that John can only be punished for the more serious crime of battery. Another example is if someone is charged with both attempted murder and murder. The attempted murder charge would be merged into the murder charge, and the person can only be punished for the murder. Overall, merger of offenses is a legal concept that prevents people from being punished twice for the same crime and ensures that they are only punished for the most serious offense.

merger clause | meritorious

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:06
it means you will not be rejected today and may be accepted or WL in the future
Just got my Michigan rejection
BookwormBroker
16:10
same
RoaldDahl
16:10
@HopefullyInLawSchool: what if i already got rejected. does it mean anything
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:12
@RoaldDahl: Likely not however it could mean nothing
RoaldDahl
16:15
So if it means nothing does that mean something?
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:17
Possibly
RoaldDahl
16:26
Cool
RoaldDahl
16:26
thank you!!!! i hope it means something
pinkandblue
16:31
fart
IrishDinosaur
16:36
Mich R gang lesgooo
Did anyone else get that random get to know nova email?
HopefullyInLawSchool
17:21
Ya it was sent to all YM applicants
starfishies
17:37
Anyone get the NDLS email inviting you to apply for something even though they haven’t made a decision on your app yet
17:38
Better yet I got the email and I was rejected last month
starfishies
17:38
Wtf
starfishies
17:39
and the deadline is in like a week what is this
any cardozo movement?
BatmanBeyond
18:01
Sent a LOCI via portal, but I'm wondering if email would have gotten me a swifter response
BatmanBeyond
18:02
This whole hold/wait-list/reserve system is a headache
loci already?
BatmanBeyond
18:09
If the odds are like 1-2% I don't think it matters much by the numbers
12:11
I got the same NDLS email
OrangeThing
12:18
I think the user profiles are broken
19:29
Any word out of Notre Dame?
19:29
Only the invitation to apply for LSE
19:29
Anyone received a decision from NDLS?
19:50
when did u guys apply that just heard from umich? they havent even glanced at my app yet
0:30
how am i supposed to spy on people when profile links are broken?
Right. Broken links smh
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.