17:16
We not gonna see splitterus for 4 hrs
Warning
Info
Warning
Info
LSDefine
Simple English definitions for legal terms
mid-level scrutiny
Read a random definition: démarche
A quick definition of mid-level scrutiny:
Mid-level scrutiny is a term used in law to describe a level of examination that is not as strict as strict scrutiny, but not as lenient as rational basis scrutiny. It is also known as intermediate scrutiny. This level of scrutiny is used to evaluate laws that may affect certain groups of people differently, such as gender or sexual orientation. The court will examine the law to determine if it is substantially related to an important government interest.
A more thorough explanation:
Definition: Mid-level scrutiny is a legal standard used by courts to evaluate laws that may discriminate against certain groups of people. It is also known as intermediate scrutiny. This standard requires the government to show that the law serves an important government interest and is substantially related to achieving that interest.
Example: One example of a law that would be subject to mid-level scrutiny is a state law that requires all firefighters to be at least 6 feet tall. This law may discriminate against women and people of certain ethnicities who are typically shorter in stature. To pass mid-level scrutiny, the government would need to show that the height requirement is necessary for the job and that there are no alternative ways to ensure public safety.
Another example of a law that would be subject to mid-level scrutiny is a state law that prohibits same-sex couples from adopting children. This law may discriminate against LGBTQ+ individuals. To pass mid-level scrutiny, the government would need to show that the law serves an important government interest, such as promoting the best interests of children, and that the prohibition on same-sex adoption is substantially related to achieving that interest.
These examples illustrate how mid-level scrutiny requires the government to justify laws that may discriminate against certain groups of people. The government must show that the law serves an important government interest and that there are no less discriminatory alternatives to achieving that interest.