Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

mid-level scrutiny

Read a random definition: entire-contract clause

A quick definition of mid-level scrutiny:

Mid-level scrutiny is a term used in law to describe a level of examination that is not as strict as strict scrutiny, but not as lenient as rational basis scrutiny. It is also known as intermediate scrutiny. This level of scrutiny is used to evaluate laws that may affect certain groups of people differently, such as gender or sexual orientation. The court will examine the law to determine if it is substantially related to an important government interest.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: Mid-level scrutiny is a legal standard used by courts to evaluate laws that may discriminate against certain groups of people. It is also known as intermediate scrutiny. This standard requires the government to show that the law serves an important government interest and is substantially related to achieving that interest.

Example: One example of a law that would be subject to mid-level scrutiny is a state law that requires all firefighters to be at least 6 feet tall. This law may discriminate against women and people of certain ethnicities who are typically shorter in stature. To pass mid-level scrutiny, the government would need to show that the height requirement is necessary for the job and that there are no alternative ways to ensure public safety.

Another example of a law that would be subject to mid-level scrutiny is a state law that prohibits same-sex couples from adopting children. This law may discriminate against LGBTQ+ individuals. To pass mid-level scrutiny, the government would need to show that the law serves an important government interest, such as promoting the best interests of children, and that the prohibition on same-sex adoption is substantially related to achieving that interest.

These examples illustrate how mid-level scrutiny requires the government to justify laws that may discriminate against certain groups of people. The government must show that the law serves an important government interest and that there are no less discriminatory alternatives to achieving that interest.

middle thread | midnight deadline

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:17
Possibly
RoaldDahl
16:26
Cool
RoaldDahl
16:26
thank you!!!! i hope it means something
pinkandblue
16:31
fart
IrishDinosaur
16:36
Mich R gang lesgooo
Did anyone else get that random get to know nova email?
HopefullyInLawSchool
17:21
Ya it was sent to all YM applicants
starfishies
17:37
Anyone get the NDLS email inviting you to apply for something even though they haven’t made a decision on your app yet
17:38
Better yet I got the email and I was rejected last month
starfishies
17:38
Wtf
starfishies
17:39
and the deadline is in like a week what is this
any cardozo movement?
BatmanBeyond
18:01
Sent a LOCI via portal, but I'm wondering if email would have gotten me a swifter response
BatmanBeyond
18:02
This whole hold/wait-list/reserve system is a headache
loci already?
BatmanBeyond
18:09
If the odds are like 1-2% I don't think it matters much by the numbers
12:11
I got the same NDLS email
OrangeThing
12:18
I think the user profiles are broken
19:29
Any word out of Notre Dame?
19:29
Only the invitation to apply for LSE
19:29
Anyone received a decision from NDLS?
19:50
when did u guys apply that just heard from umich? they havent even glanced at my app yet
0:30
how am i supposed to spy on people when profile links are broken?
Right. Broken links smh
I've been UR since first/second week of Jan, no updates otherwise, is that a bad sign? At or above median LSAT and above 75th gpa.
The profile links are not working for me. anybody else?
13:18
i’m in the same boat mastermonkey but with lower stats. i hope i hear back by mid march
CheeseIsMyLoveLanguage
13:24
@mastermonkey45: Looking at some of the recent decisions in relation to when they went complete, I'd say it's a good sign. It seems many declines were sent within about 5-6 weeks of completion. Given those were applications that were SENT in January, I'd say that means you're still solidly in the running. :)
14:30
Sent an app to OSU in early december and have STILL not heard back
Give it 4 more weeks at least. Everyone in this chat needs to wait longer.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.