Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

Mike O'Connor rule

Read a random definition: rationabili parte bonorum

A quick definition of Mike O'Connor rule:

The Mike O'Connor rule is a labor law doctrine that says if an employer makes changes to work conditions after a union wins an initial-representation election, but before any objections are resolved, it is considered a violation of the National Labor Relations Act if the objections are rejected. If the objections are sustained, the employer had no duty to bargain, but if they are rejected, the employer is considered to have been under a duty to bargain from the date of the election, which is why the unilateral changes are automatic violations of the Act. This rule was established in the case of Mike O'Connor Chevrolet-Buick-GMC Co. in 1974.

A more thorough explanation:

The Mike O'Connor rule is a labor law doctrine that states that any unilateral changes made by an employer after a union victory in an initial-representation election, but before the employer's objections have been resolved, are automatic violations of the National Labor Relations Act if the employer's objections are rejected.

For example, if a union wins an election to represent workers at a company, but the employer objects to the election results, any changes made by the employer to the workers' wages, hours, or working conditions without bargaining with the union would be considered a violation of the law if the employer's objections are rejected.

The Mike O'Connor rule is important because it ensures that employers cannot make changes to workers' rights without first bargaining with their union representatives. This helps to protect workers from unfair treatment and ensures that their rights are respected.

migratory divorce | mild exigency

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
MIAMI A
[] AromaticTroubledDormouse
20:55
How does one know if they are UR1 or UR2?
[] AromaticTroubledDormouse
20:56
CONGRATS MACAQUE!
TY
got a random stanford email and almost had a heart attack
ALSO CONGRATS!
Congrats1!
21:15
Miami A, yall I'm so excited I could cry.
21:15
Feel like I can finally stop holding my breath!! Whew!!!
[] baddestbunny
22:16
every time I get accosted by a strange man who follows me around because my male coworkers were too busy talking to walk me back to my car I get closer to saying we need to bring back traditional gender roles
Dkk
22:32
Nice! @Macaque
Dkk
22:32
@Aromatic, Have to guess.
Dkk
22:33
That sucks @Bunny do you have to go to the hospital?
[] baddestbunny
22:40
I said accosted not assaulted
23:35
guys. my notre dame address just went long is this good or bad
1a2b3c4d26z
23:37
Oooooo me too
23:37
omg is this good or bad
Dkk
23:47
Idk if gender roles are gunna fix that then.
23:49
it looks like most people who applied in october last cycle didn't get a decision until january... does it even mean anything that our addresses went long??
hows ED 2 compared to ED 1?
Dkk
0:10
No idea
windyMagician
0:34
reporting live to say my ndls address also went long
does it mean anything ^
Dkk
2:21
NDLS and Fordham took a very long time last year. It's good info for people to know.
[] baddestbunny
4:29
let’s get after it boys and girls
Dkk
5:21
I gtg to bed soon.
Dkk
5:22
Big day today. Gunna be a crazy one. I will sleep through the first half.
good morning lsd it is 5 am EST
also jazzy my ndls address went long ages ago i sadly do not think it means anything
my stanford address also went long LOL i think at most it's an indicator it's under review
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.