Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

motion to alter or amend the judgment

Read a random definition: Shifting executory interest

A quick definition of motion to alter or amend the judgment:

Term: Motion to Alter or Amend the Judgment

Definition: A motion to alter or amend the judgment is a request made by a party to the court to correct a mistake in the judgment. This mistake could be a mistake of law or fact. The motion must be filed within ten days after the judgment is entered. It is not used to correct clerical errors in the judgment. The motion is usually used to address substantive issues regarding the judgment, such as an intervening change in the law or newly discovered evidence that was not available at trial.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: A motion to alter or amend the judgment is a request made by a party to the court to correct a substantive error in the judgment. This error could be a mistake of law or fact that needs to be corrected. It is not used to correct clerical errors in the judgment. This type of error can be corrected in a motion for relief from the judgment. A motion to alter or amend the judgment must be filed within ten days after the judgment is entered. It is usually directed to substantive issues regarding the judgment, such as an intervening change in the law or newly discovered evidence that was not available at trial.

Example: If a judge makes a mistake in the judgment, a party can file a motion to alter or amend the judgment to correct the mistake. For example, if the judge mistakenly awards damages to the wrong party, the party who should have received the damages can file a motion to alter or amend the judgment to correct the mistake.

Example: Another example of when a party might file a motion to alter or amend the judgment is if there is newly discovered evidence that was not available at trial. For instance, if a witness comes forward after the trial and provides evidence that would have changed the outcome of the case, the party can file a motion to alter or amend the judgment to have the case reopened and the new evidence considered.

Explanation: These examples illustrate how a motion to alter or amend the judgment can be used to correct substantive errors in the judgment. In the first example, the mistake was a factual error that needed to be corrected. In the second example, the new evidence was a substantive issue that needed to be considered in order to render a fair judgment.

motion papers | motion to compel discovery

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 5 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
17:06
dkk what's your one issue
texaslawhopefully
17:06
I was a one issue voter. My one fucking issue was that Trump encouraged an insurrection.
texaslawhopefully
17:07
That's all anyone should've needed.
17:07
i am a 1 issue voter: national debt.
jackfrost11770
17:07
THERES A COP FUNERAL AND NOW THE BUSES ARENT RUNNING TO MY PLACE SO I HAVE TO WALK IN THE FREEZING COLD HOME
texaslawhopefully
17:07
Not to mention that he's completely thrown away liberalism and classic western political philosophy, but yk your eggs will be cheaper so it's worth it
how bad are these tariffs gonna get for us everyday consumers?
@jackfrost11770: FUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUu
jackfrost11770
17:08
FUCK THE NYPD
WASP HAHAHAHAHHA
texaslawhopefully
17:08
Estimates are about 4k fruitbat
YRDSL
17:08
im a 1 issue voter - if i want someone to be elected i vote for them
woof
texaslawhopefully
17:08
I've seen some that could be as high as 7k though
17:08
@jackfrost11770: ya prolly don't buy any lotto tickets tonite
get on that trump coin before the rug pull lol
Dkk
17:09
@BigStrongBug: I don't consider myself a one issue voter but if I had to pick one it would be gender relations.
i am a one issue voter for the economy, which is why i voted harris
texaslawhopefully
17:10
Here's a fairly well respected estimate fruitybat: The proposed tariffs could cost consumers an additional $2,500 to $7,600 a year per household, according to estimates, said Jonathan Gold, vice president of supply chain and customs policy for the National Retail Federation.
i am a voter so i voted
17:11
Lol what does gender relations mean
17:11
Like are you anti gay marriage?
texaslawhopefully
17:11
@Dkk: So you care about gender relations over the Constitution, institutional stability, the economy, political norms, etc.?
blue collar trump voters are gonna blame anything but him anyway when the price of their household consumption goes through the roof. I wonder how they'll spin that narrative.
17:11
Or are you an all inclusive hater and include trans folks too
texaslawhopefully
17:12
Even if you have conservative social values you still shouldn't like Trump lol, but that's a whole diff convo
I love when people prefer putting not talking about gender in schools at the top of the agenda instead of dealing with school shootings
this is going to blow your mind but once you realize women and men are more similar than different you will drown in pussy or dick
17:12
@HopefullyInLawSchool: $45k @ KS is really good. $145k is to attend it is not a bad deal
facts knowledgeable
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.