Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

Mutual Wills

Read a random definition: evidentiary fact

A quick definition of Mutual Wills:

Mutual wills are wills made by two people, usually spouses or committed couples. They are two separate wills that are the same or very similar. The purpose of mutual wills is to give the survivor of the two people the property in the wills, and then to specified individuals after the survivor dies. Mutual wills can have a clause that says they cannot be changed without both people agreeing. If a mutual will is made correctly, the surviving spouse cannot change the will or give away the property while they are alive. Before one person dies, either person can change their will as long as they tell the other person first.

A more thorough explanation:

Mutual wills are wills made by two or more people, usually spouses or committed couples. These wills are reciprocal, identical, or substantially similar. The purpose of mutual wills is to grant the survivor of the two the property contained in the wills, and then to specified individuals after the death of the survivor.

For example, John and Jane are a married couple. They create mutual wills that state that if one of them dies, the other will inherit all of their property. After the death of the survivor, their property will be distributed to their children.

Mutual wills can contain clauses that they are not revocable without the consent of both parties. Without such a clause, mutual wills do not automatically carry the presumption of a contract.

For example, if John and Jane's mutual wills do not contain a clause that they are not revocable without the consent of both parties, John can change his will after Jane's death.

If a mutual will has been properly created, a surviving spouse cannot later change the terms of the will or make an inter vivos transfer of funds. Prior to the death of the first spouse, however, either spouse can make changes to their will as long as they first notify the other spouse that they have done so.

For example, if John and Jane's mutual wills contain a clause that they are not revocable without the consent of both parties, John cannot change his will after Jane's death. However, before Jane's death, either John or Jane can make changes to their will as long as they first notify the other spouse that they have done so.

Mutual Material Mistake | naked option

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
texaslawhopefully
22:30
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That all sounds great. It sounds like it has fairly diverse cuisine for a smaller city
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.