Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

mutuality doctrine

Read a random definition: in executione rei judicatae

A quick definition of mutuality doctrine:

Term: MUTUALITY DOCTRINE

Definition: The mutuality doctrine is a legal requirement that both parties must have been in privity with one another in an earlier proceeding to bar a party from relitigating an issue determined against that party in an earlier action. This means that if one party has already been found guilty or liable for something in a previous case, they cannot be sued again for the same thing by someone who was not involved in the previous case.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: The mutuality doctrine is a legal principle that requires both parties to have been in privity with one another in an earlier proceeding for collateral-estoppel to bar a party from relitigating an issue determined against that party in the earlier action. It is also known as mutuality of parties.

Examples: If a person sues a company for breach of contract and loses, they cannot sue the same company again for the same issue unless both parties were in privity with one another in the earlier proceeding. For instance, if the person was an employee of the company during the first lawsuit, they cannot sue the company again as a customer or vendor. This is because the mutuality doctrine requires both parties to have been in privity with one another in the earlier proceeding.

Another example is if a landlord sues a tenant for unpaid rent and wins, the tenant cannot sue the landlord for the same issue unless both parties were in privity with one another in the earlier proceeding. For instance, if the tenant sublets the property to another person during the first lawsuit, they cannot sue the landlord again for the same issue. This is because the mutuality doctrine requires both parties to have been in privity with one another in the earlier proceeding.

These examples illustrate how the mutuality doctrine works in practice. It prevents parties from relitigating the same issue repeatedly and ensures that both parties have a fair chance to present their case in court.

mutuality | mutuality of debts

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
13:34
i don't think it has a detrimental effect on your chances of admission
13:34
but also you don't need to tell them anything so lol
Can y'all help me understand something lol. What does it mean for an app to "go complete"? Is that when the school has reviewed it and made a decision?
13:35
Na, it's when they have all the required information
Gotcha. So what would be the difference between received and completed?
Does complete entail like the app + LORs?
13:35
correct
That makes sense. Thank you!
13:36
complete basically means they've acknowledged receipt and it's ready to go under review whenever they start the deliberative process
Quillinit
13:40
I still haven't had Chicago or Cornell go complete, but I think that's just how they be
13:41
when did you submit
CaringEquableGuppy
13:42
How do you know when an application is complete? Is it on LSAC or the school's portal?
13:43
it'll be on the school-specific portal
Quillinit
13:44
when they opened
Quillinit
13:45
they both say something along the lines of "received and waiting to be processed"
13:48
anyone have good resources for revising a personal statement for reuse after applying with it last cycle?
13:49
Any guesses when Cornell and Penn CRS fee waivers will go out?
13:51
@Quillinit: from my recollection, chicago and cornell collapse complete/UR1 into a single step, so they may simply not be ready to begin reviewing applications
13:52
i think it's fair to assume, barring a handful of schools like UVA, most schools won't begin reviewing applications in earnest until the beginning of next month at the earliest, so it wouldn't be surprising to hear that applications are just sitting in the queue
13:54
@oakenrays: I was just gonna write a new one personally but I think you want to make it recognizably different from your previous PS
13:56
@baddestbunny: definitely agree that some revision and additional information is warranted but, my why law is the same... I guess just tell the same story in a different way
14:03
ugh fineeee I'll write a new stupid essay
14:07
yeah I told my last essay about a formative experience and am trying to update it now to be about what I’ve learned since that experience
recently wrapped up interview
i re-wrote my PS this cycle when I reapplied
fire drill at work
so lit
Quillinit
15:10
oh fun @info-man, Chicago just changed to complete today, so we'll see
boglue
15:23
do you have to have lawhub advantage for the lsd status checker to work
lawhub kind of a freaky ass name now that i think about it
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.