Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

mutuality doctrine

Read a random definition: Court of Cassation

A quick definition of mutuality doctrine:

Term: MUTUALITY DOCTRINE

Definition: The mutuality doctrine is a legal requirement that both parties must have been in privity with one another in an earlier proceeding to bar a party from relitigating an issue determined against that party in an earlier action. This means that if one party has already been found guilty or liable for something in a previous case, they cannot be sued again for the same thing by someone who was not involved in the previous case.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: The mutuality doctrine is a legal principle that requires both parties to have been in privity with one another in an earlier proceeding for collateral-estoppel to bar a party from relitigating an issue determined against that party in the earlier action. It is also known as mutuality of parties.

Examples: If a person sues a company for breach of contract and loses, they cannot sue the same company again for the same issue unless both parties were in privity with one another in the earlier proceeding. For instance, if the person was an employee of the company during the first lawsuit, they cannot sue the company again as a customer or vendor. This is because the mutuality doctrine requires both parties to have been in privity with one another in the earlier proceeding.

Another example is if a landlord sues a tenant for unpaid rent and wins, the tenant cannot sue the landlord for the same issue unless both parties were in privity with one another in the earlier proceeding. For instance, if the tenant sublets the property to another person during the first lawsuit, they cannot sue the landlord again for the same issue. This is because the mutuality doctrine requires both parties to have been in privity with one another in the earlier proceeding.

These examples illustrate how the mutuality doctrine works in practice. It prevents parties from relitigating the same issue repeatedly and ensures that both parties have a fair chance to present their case in court.

mutuality | mutuality of debts

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
16:44
Yeah, I would have definitely gone to the hotel if I knew they booked a room for me. At the very least, it would be proper to show up personally and explain your extraneous circumstances
Law-Shark
16:44
Nah but it's in your name. I went to an ASD. I asked the school for an extra night and they gave it to me. You just need to plan things better.
Law-Shark
16:45
This is like peak disconenct between the male and female brain.
16:45
i think that's where i was confused then
Law-Shark
16:45
disconnect*
Law-Shark
16:45
You live and you learn
16:45
because i did let one of the staff know i'd be leaving early and thought that would be enough
16:46
but i was confused why i got an e-mail with a room cuz I didn't ask for it at all
Law-Shark
16:46
Well, you know now what to do.
16:47
well on their end they prob shouldn't just be buying hotel rooms for ppl who don't request it and then getting mad I didn't go
16:48
goof
16:48
Did you get any materials for admitted students day explaining that they would be booking hotel rooms?
16:49
there was an opt in on the form but I didn't select yes
16:49
Hmm, that's weird
16:50
i think it's unprofessional of them to call you like what if you had an emergency and had to leave? why is it their business why you didn't stay? not like they're lacking money and $100.00 hotel room is gona make them bankrupt
16:50
i figured it was an error and I was on the road so I didn't read into it. plus it would make more sense for it to be the night before cuz it started at 9am? so I was like uhhh and paid it no mind
16:51
@bigfatsloth: that's what i'm saying, they were gonna pay no matter what
16:54
"This is like peak disconenct between the male and female brain." like bffr
16:55
It was probably an administrative error then. I can't imagine why they would book hotel rooms for people that didn't select yes. I would maybe follow up with them and apologize for the misunderstanding to avoid any awkwardness
Denny
16:56
who watch that arsenal game
16:56
I'm a Chelsea fan unfortunately
damn why are yall fighting i the lsd.law gc
Denny
17:14
@ET025: but ur not watching champions league?
Denny
17:15
declan rice did a madness
17:20
@Denny: Not today. Doing more LSAT studying this afternoon, but I saw that. I think Chelsea missed out on him. (this is probably more suited for OT)
Does anyone have experience getting their aid package reconsidered at WashU? How long does it take to hear back after sending the form?
MrThickRopes
21:01
fo pm gon be good to us tmrw
Mr ropes is hopeful again so I am too
21:33
lets go ropes
21:53
[deleted by starfishies]
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.