Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

mutuality of estoppel

Read a random definition: pro hac vice

A quick definition of mutuality of estoppel:

Term: MUTUALITY OF ESTOPPEL

Definition: Mutual estoppel means that a decision is not final for one person unless it would also be final against that person. This means that if a judgment is made in favor of someone, it is not final unless the opposite decision would also be final against that person.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: The principle of mutuality of estoppel states that a judgment cannot be conclusively in favor of one party unless the opposite decision would also be conclusively against that party.

Example: Let's say that John sues Jane for breach of contract, and the court rules in favor of John. If Jane tries to sue John for the same breach of contract in a different court, John can use the principle of mutuality of estoppel to prevent Jane from relitigating the same issue. In other words, if the court had ruled in favor of Jane in the first case, John would not be able to use the principle of mutuality of estoppel to prevent Jane from suing him again.

Explanation: The principle of mutuality of estoppel ensures that both parties are bound by the same legal decision. It prevents a party from taking advantage of a favorable judgment without also accepting the consequences of an unfavorable judgment. In the example above, if John could use the principle of mutuality of estoppel to prevent Jane from relitigating the same issue, it would be unfair because Jane would not have the same opportunity to do the same if the court had ruled in her favor in the first case.

mutuality of debts | mutuality of obligation

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 5 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
17:06
dkk what's your one issue
texaslawhopefully
17:06
I was a one issue voter. My one fucking issue was that Trump encouraged an insurrection.
texaslawhopefully
17:07
That's all anyone should've needed.
17:07
i am a 1 issue voter: national debt.
jackfrost11770
17:07
THERES A COP FUNERAL AND NOW THE BUSES ARENT RUNNING TO MY PLACE SO I HAVE TO WALK IN THE FREEZING COLD HOME
texaslawhopefully
17:07
Not to mention that he's completely thrown away liberalism and classic western political philosophy, but yk your eggs will be cheaper so it's worth it
how bad are these tariffs gonna get for us everyday consumers?
@jackfrost11770: FUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUu
jackfrost11770
17:08
FUCK THE NYPD
WASP HAHAHAHAHHA
texaslawhopefully
17:08
Estimates are about 4k fruitbat
YRDSL
17:08
im a 1 issue voter - if i want someone to be elected i vote for them
woof
texaslawhopefully
17:08
I've seen some that could be as high as 7k though
17:08
@jackfrost11770: ya prolly don't buy any lotto tickets tonite
get on that trump coin before the rug pull lol
Dkk
17:09
@BigStrongBug: I don't consider myself a one issue voter but if I had to pick one it would be gender relations.
i am a one issue voter for the economy, which is why i voted harris
texaslawhopefully
17:10
Here's a fairly well respected estimate fruitybat: The proposed tariffs could cost consumers an additional $2,500 to $7,600 a year per household, according to estimates, said Jonathan Gold, vice president of supply chain and customs policy for the National Retail Federation.
i am a voter so i voted
17:11
Lol what does gender relations mean
17:11
Like are you anti gay marriage?
texaslawhopefully
17:11
@Dkk: So you care about gender relations over the Constitution, institutional stability, the economy, political norms, etc.?
blue collar trump voters are gonna blame anything but him anyway when the price of their household consumption goes through the roof. I wonder how they'll spin that narrative.
17:11
Or are you an all inclusive hater and include trans folks too
texaslawhopefully
17:12
Even if you have conservative social values you still shouldn't like Trump lol, but that's a whole diff convo
I love when people prefer putting not talking about gender in schools at the top of the agenda instead of dealing with school shootings
this is going to blow your mind but once you realize women and men are more similar than different you will drown in pussy or dick
17:12
@HopefullyInLawSchool: $45k @ KS is really good. $145k is to attend it is not a bad deal
facts knowledgeable
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.