Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

mutuum

Read a random definition: option to purchase real property

A quick definition of mutuum:

Term: MUTUUM

Definition: Mutuum is a type of transaction where goods are given to someone, but instead of returning the same goods, they are replaced with other goods of the same kind. This is considered a sale or exchange, not a loan. In Roman law, mutuum was a contract where the borrower received money or goods and had to return an equivalent amount. It was one of the real contracts, along with loan for use and deposit and pledge.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: Mutuum is a type of transaction where goods are delivered, but instead of being returned, they are replaced by other goods of the same kind. This is considered a sale or exchange, not a bailment, because the specific goods are not returned. In Roman law, mutuum was a real contract where money or fungible goods were lent to a borrower, who was strictly liable to return an equivalent amount. Any interest had to be agreed upon beforehand.

  • When John borrowed a bag of sugar from his neighbor, he promised to return the same amount of sugar. This is an example of mutuum.
  • In ancient Rome, a moneylender would lend coins to a borrower, who would have to return the same amount of coins. This is also an example of mutuum.

These examples illustrate mutuum because in both cases, the borrower is not returning the exact same goods that were borrowed. Instead, they are returning goods of the same kind or value. In the Roman law example, the borrower is strictly liable to return an equivalent amount of money or fungible goods, which means they cannot return something of lesser value.

mutus et surdus | mysterious disappearance

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
oh i just checked, i still have to pay even if i have a fee waiver, damn
14:48
imo go basic with FW, then when (if) you run out of questions/tests, upgrade OR just take tests /drill on lawhib
14:48
the long sleep
ill give a free edition a try first, if i like then i will purchase. they have 3 free tests, right?
14:50
oh yea obi go free- yes 3 free tests. yes they can be crude/'mean' but they explain all 5 answers and when u upgrade they have good write ups on ea question
ill start prepping in january and aim for august lsat or september even. would it look bad if i have 3-4 attempts on my record? I already took it twice and cancelled my first score so im bit worried about that lol
nope lots of people take the lsat 3-4 times
14:59
@VolatileClumsyAcolyte: is it bad: some schools seem to prefer 1 and done vs 2+ takes. Is it better for you? If score much higher- yes. Overall, if it makes sense for u go for it
you might have to write an addendum though, but schools really want higher medians so if they see a big number that's all they honestly care about
14:59
^^^
CLS is my dream school and the only reason I am considering reapplying is to probably score higher and have better chances there, so fingers crossed they're chill about it
15:05
with that targeted goal/ willingness to take a year to improve score, and from what you have said, it seems like a great option to reapply early next cycle w/ a higher score. best of luck!
15:09
guys is there any chance for me to get into T14s? I applied to some but was convinced to apply to the rest, just feel its too late in the cycle for my stats (170 3.68)
more likely than not you make it into at least one t14
15:14
Hey long time no see hahaha, the prob with that is it has the range of up to 172, Im only 170
15:14
If u have the top range at my stats, there's only like 9 ppl who made it into T14s
yeah but it's also including people below your stats
15:15
Yeah, really my issue is deciding whether to R&R or to just take UF law
also if you reduce the top end of lsat to 170, you have a 33% chance at NYU+columbia, 67% at NU, 33 at mich, 40% berk, 40% UCLA, 100% Cornell, and 50% gulc
realistically you would make it into at least one
15:16
I'm still waiting on a bunch of T14 so hopefully those stats are a good indicator
15:16
idk wait it out - if good offer take if no good offer R&R
i dont think you need to R&R im pretty sure you make it into at least one t14
but if you apply earlier its just a lot easier
15:17
thats odd I didn't see those stats, but ok. We talked abt this awhile back and I'm working on Columbia + Berkeley rn then Cornell, probs is I'm not gonna produce good Why X's before the 25th but whatever
https://www.lsd.law/search/cV9E6 this is artificially deflated because it's only below your stats
someone got into harvard and chicago with your stats
15:19
Why is that deflating it? isnt that a better indicator instead of choosing above median LSATs? Genuinely curious just wondering
when stats are close because of the variability you want a little above your stats and a little below to get more data, adcoms arent so finnicky that 2 points on the lsat is make or break unless it puts you above median, and even then 50% are below median so it's not as big of an impact as you might think. the reason the chanceme tool goes a little above and below your stats by default is to capture a more accurate picture
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.