Legal Definitions - N.C.D.

Stands for NEMINE CONTRADICENTE.

This Latin phrase translates to "without anyone contradicting" or "no one dissenting." In a legal or formal context, it signifies that a decision, resolution, or vote was passed with unanimous consent, meaning no one present voiced an objection or voted against it. It indicates complete agreement among all participants.

Here are some examples illustrating the application of N.C.D.:

• Example 1: Corporate Board Resolution

  During a quarterly meeting of Tech Innovations Inc.'s board of directors, a proposal to invest in a new research and development project was put to a vote. After discussion, the chairman called for a vote, and all seven board members present voted in favor. The minutes recorded the decision as having passed N.C.D.

  Explanation: This illustrates N.C.D. because every single board member supported the proposal without any opposition, indicating unanimous agreement.

• Example 2: Legislative Committee Vote

  A congressional committee was reviewing a bill aimed at improving cybersecurity infrastructure. After several amendments and debates, the final version of the bill was presented for a vote within the committee. All twelve members of the committee voted to send the bill to the full House for consideration, with no dissenting votes.

  Explanation: The committee's decision to advance the bill was made N.C.D. because every member present agreed, demonstrating a complete lack of opposition to the measure.

• Example 3: Homeowners' Association Bylaw Amendment

  At the annual general meeting of the Lakeside Community Homeowners' Association, a motion was introduced to amend a bylaw regarding pet restrictions. After a thorough discussion and clarification, the motion was put to a vote among the attending members. All homeowners present voted in favor of the amendment, with no one voting against it.

  Explanation: The amendment passed N.C.D. because every homeowner who participated in the vote expressed agreement, signifying that there was no dissent regarding the change to the community's rules.