Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

ne unques seise que dower

Read a random definition: DWOP

A quick definition of ne unques seise que dower:

Term: ne unques seise que dower

Definition: Ne unques seise que dower means that in a legal case where a widow is claiming her right to a portion of her deceased husband's estate, the defendant denies that the husband ever owned property that could be inherited by the widow. It is a plea used in court to dispute the widow's claim to a dower estate.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: In a legal case where a widow is claiming her right to a portion of her deceased husband's property, the tenant (person being sued) may deny the claim by saying that the husband never owned the property in question.

Example: Sarah is a widow who believes she is entitled to a portion of her late husband's estate. However, when she takes the case to court, the defendant argues ne unques seise que dower, claiming that Sarah's husband never actually owned the property she is claiming.

This definition means that in a legal case where a widow is claiming her right to a portion of her deceased husband's property, the defendant can deny the claim by saying that the husband never owned the property in question. The example shows how this defense can be used in a court case.

ne unques executor | ne unques son receiver

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
texaslawhopefully
13:14
it is prolly they just had a great overall narrative and not KJD
13:14
^
13:14
KJD 🗑️ squad
Maybe a fulbright alone isnt insanity, but pairing it with several first author pubs is sick
13:15
Besides lion ur killin jt
texaslawhopefully
13:15
yeah half tuition at CLS is fantastic
Thank you! But lowkey my page a lil fake. Withdrew from UChi after missing the II and the fact my future wife wants to leave the midwest anyways (i cant lie its mainly the first reason tho)
13:16
UChi didn’t inv u but you hit cls w half
13:16
That’s crazy haha
Honestly no clue. I missed NU waves too. Quite frankly, I think my why chicago statements were very meh
My PS and DS were sort of emotion but ended on a happy note. My why chi’s also did a little emotional stuff and I think it might’ve hurt me a bit. No clue tho🤷🏽‍♂️
Trismegistus
13:17
im pubbed in a bar association does that not mean anything wtfffff :(
13:18
@ImpartialLion: water under the bridge for you now tbh 🔥
13:18
Wonder what HLS is doing w our apps tho
texaslawhopefully
13:18
at least you're wondering lol
texaslawhopefully
13:18
I had the II and then got R'd
lilypadfrog
13:19
guys am I part of this conversation i also have a good lsat and no acceptances. I want to feel included
Trismegistus
13:19
my own alma mater straight up ignoring me too
13:19
@lilypadfrog: ur not a kjd without work experience. Back off
I think I’m headed for the HLS WL. I heard that if you get off the WL, you put down your deposit before you hear your offer? Idk how i feel ab that
13:19
*
Every thursday, i still pretend like I have a chance at a II tho
13:20
Yeh my friend got it 5/15 last year… crazy late
13:20
Same same maybe tomorrow 😭
lilypadfrog
13:20
@sadpadresfan: :(
texaslawhopefully
13:21
that's a good thing 😭
texaslawhopefully
13:21
you have actual work experience
Trismegistus
13:21
i was on HLS WL and waited all summer :(
atwatodbit
13:21
i cannot imagine taking HLS at sticker with a good scholly elsewhere. i am trying to just pretend they dont exist tbh
Trismegistus
13:21
got a II and everything
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.