Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

negative-pledge clause

Read a random definition: extrinsic fraud

A quick definition of negative-pledge clause:

A negative-pledge clause is a rule that says if someone borrows money without giving something valuable as security, they cannot give anything valuable as security to someone else without asking the first lender first. It can also be a rule in a contract that says a company cannot use its things as security if it will make the people who lent it money less safe.

A more thorough explanation:

A negative-pledge clause is a provision in a loan agreement or bond indenture that restricts the borrower or issuer from pledging any assets as collateral to another lender without the consent of the first lender or bondholders.

Suppose a company borrows money from Bank A without providing any collateral. The loan agreement may include a negative-pledge clause that prohibits the company from pledging any assets as collateral to another lender without Bank A's permission. This clause protects Bank A's interest in the loan and ensures that it has priority over any other lenders.

A bond indenture may also include a negative-pledge clause that restricts the issuer from pledging any assets as collateral to another lender if it would result in less security for the bondholders. For instance, if a company issues bonds and pledges its assets as collateral to another lender, the bondholders may have less security in case of default. The negative-pledge clause ensures that the issuer cannot take any action that would jeopardize the bondholders' interests.

These examples illustrate how a negative-pledge clause protects the interests of lenders and bondholders by restricting the borrower or issuer from pledging any assets as collateral to other parties without their consent. This clause ensures that the lender or bondholders have priority over other creditors and that their interests are safeguarded.

negative plea | negative prescription

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
Just got my Michigan rejection
BookwormBroker
16:10
same
RoaldDahl
16:10
@HopefullyInLawSchool: what if i already got rejected. does it mean anything
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:12
@RoaldDahl: Likely not however it could mean nothing
RoaldDahl
16:15
So if it means nothing does that mean something?
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:17
Possibly
RoaldDahl
16:26
Cool
RoaldDahl
16:26
thank you!!!! i hope it means something
pinkandblue
16:31
fart
IrishDinosaur
16:36
Mich R gang lesgooo
Did anyone else get that random get to know nova email?
HopefullyInLawSchool
17:21
Ya it was sent to all YM applicants
starfishies
17:37
Anyone get the NDLS email inviting you to apply for something even though they haven’t made a decision on your app yet
17:38
Better yet I got the email and I was rejected last month
starfishies
17:38
Wtf
starfishies
17:39
and the deadline is in like a week what is this
any cardozo movement?
BatmanBeyond
18:01
Sent a LOCI via portal, but I'm wondering if email would have gotten me a swifter response
BatmanBeyond
18:02
This whole hold/wait-list/reserve system is a headache
loci already?
BatmanBeyond
18:09
If the odds are like 1-2% I don't think it matters much by the numbers
12:11
I got the same NDLS email
OrangeThing
12:18
I think the user profiles are broken
19:29
Any word out of Notre Dame?
19:29
Only the invitation to apply for LSE
19:29
Anyone received a decision from NDLS?
19:50
when did u guys apply that just heard from umich? they havent even glanced at my app yet
0:30
how am i supposed to spy on people when profile links are broken?
Right. Broken links smh
I've been UR since first/second week of Jan, no updates otherwise, is that a bad sign? At or above median LSAT and above 75th gpa.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.