Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

Negative Will

Read a random definition: Rule 116 amendment

A quick definition of Negative Will:

A negative will is when someone tries to prevent a person from inheriting their things by saying it directly in their will, like "I don't want X to get anything." However, this usually doesn't work and the person may still be able to inherit.

A more thorough explanation:

A negative will is a type of will where the person making the will (testator) tries to disinherit someone by directly stating their desire to do so. For example, the testator might write "I disinherit X" in their will. However, this method of disinheritance is usually not effective.

For instance, if a testator writes in their will "I disinherit my son John," it may not be legally binding because the law generally favors a person's right to inherit from their parents. Therefore, a negative will may not be enough to prevent someone from inheriting.

Another example of a negative will is if a testator writes "I leave nothing to my daughter Mary." This statement alone may not be enough to disinherit Mary because the law may still recognize her as an heir and entitle her to a share of the estate.

Negative signal | Negligence

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
Dkk
5:22
Big day today. Gunna be a crazy one. I will sleep through the first half.
good morning lsd it is 5 am EST
also jazzy my ndls address went long ages ago i sadly do not think it means anything
my stanford address also went long LOL i think at most it's an indicator it's under review
WorthlessAttractiveZombie
7:44
My berkeley paragraph finally disappeared. I definitely think it is just an indicator that they are actively reviewing files, and does not mean anything about A, WL, or Rs
WorthlessAttractiveZombie
7:46
Also has anyone's date disappeared for W&L? Mine did last night
7:55
@WorthlessAttractiveZombie: mine did yesterday morning
7:56
Oops sorry I meant Vilanova. Mine disappeared last week
soapy
8:48
UMN under review! As predicted, decisions are gonna come out early December
Minus those random R decisions from UMN yesterday though right? I wonder what happened there. I don’t think I’ve seen a school start the season out with anything but As on here
almost all of my apps have been UR for 6 weeks at this point I feel exhausted waiting for them to finish
Irvine is being snobby and wont start any review until end of Nov.
Yeah, it’s tough. I’m distracting myself by playing good video games after work :)
im distracting myself by schizo-scrolling r/lawschoolamissions and every conceivable data point on this godforsaken website
it is not working
Haaa I naturally want to do that too. I’m trying to stop. They need a surgeon general’s warning on this site for perspective law students
i spend more time on here then anything else trying to rationalize that the waves from last year will match waves for this year (they won't) and that the stats of people with the same stats are indicative of my own (they aren't)
There aren't many people in my stat range so I pretty much know every result in my range after being on here for a few years
9:28
congrats on the 172 bruce
go dawgs fr
9:29
roll tide
do we foresee a fordham election day wave today (i'm delusional)
WorthlessAttractiveZombie
9:31
I think so, Jack
9:31
some people hate him. some people love him, but he a real one: https://youtu.be/w5oEqiVQcF4?t=173
9:32
[kevin oleary]
worthless i trust you implicitly you know what it will happen now.
worthless i trust you implicitly you know what it will happen now.
worthless i trust you implicitly you know what it will happen now.
worthless i trust you implicitly you know what it will happen now.
worthless i trust you implicitly you know what it will happen now.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.