Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

nihil habet

Read a random definition: conventional custom

A quick definition of nihil habet:

Term: nihil habet

Definition: Nihil habet is a Latin phrase that means "he has nothing." It is used as a form of return by a sheriff or constable who was unable to serve a scire facias or other writ on the defendant. This means that the person being served the writ could not be found or did not have any assets that could be seized to satisfy the writ.

Related term: Scire facias

A more thorough explanation:

Term: nihil habet
Definition: Nihil habet is a Latin phrase that means "he has nothing." It is used as a form of return by a sheriff or constable who was unable to serve a scire facias or other writ on the defendant. This means that the person being served with legal papers cannot be found or does not have any assets that can be seized to satisfy a judgment.
Example: If a creditor is trying to collect a debt from someone who has moved and cannot be located, the sheriff may return the writ with the notation "nihil habet" to indicate that the defendant has nothing that can be seized to satisfy the debt. Another example is if a landlord is trying to evict a tenant who has already moved out and left no forwarding address, the sheriff may return the writ with the notation "nihil habet" to indicate that the tenant cannot be found. These examples illustrate how the phrase is used to indicate that the person being served with legal papers cannot be found or does not have any assets that can be seized to satisfy a judgment.

nihil dicit default judgment | nihilism

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
14:16
^ gets it
lilypadfrog
14:16
https://www.lsd.law/users/creep/cryptanon this is one of the guys who made the website
14:16
@lilypadfrog: wow more recent than i would have wagered
14:17
how is it so that I creep a rando and their app year is 2005-2005?
14:17
2005-2006* for example
renard99
14:18
^ find that rando in your circle and ask them where they've stored all their cycle letters
ReminiscentZestyFish
14:18
Vandy??
renard99
14:18
Possibly in a dark corner of the attic in a box
VANDY
soyalmondoatmilk
14:18
vandy A let's gooooo
all the Vandy
ReminiscentZestyFish
14:18
Aint no way
jackfrost11770
14:19
Wow that's awesome nothing from vandy
GreyCeaselessMammoth
14:19
what
GreyCeaselessMammoth
14:19
fuck
renard99
14:19
@soyalmondoatmilk: Congratulations!!!
jackfrost11770
14:19
I applied in November
jackfrost11770
14:19
Idk when the As did
GreyCeaselessMammoth
14:19
does anyone know if they usually release all at once or waht
nothing
jackfrost11770
14:20
Well I hope not otherwise I'm screwed
jackfrost11770
14:21
Anderson cooper PLEASEEEEE
For ED and their last wave of decisions it was an email all at once
GreyCeaselessMammoth
14:22
ugh
gonna go cry
jackfrost11770
14:22
Ugh
jackfrost11770
14:22
:(
ReminiscentZestyFish
14:23
Small ahh wave
GreyCeaselessMammoth
14:23
yeah the smallness of this wave makes me think there might be more to come? am i being crazy? only one wave a month it should be a tsunami rn
14:24
@jackfrost11770: chillll it still early in the cycle, especially relative to this and last yearrrr
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.