Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

no-confidence vote

Read a random definition: accipitare

A quick definition of no-confidence vote:

A no-confidence vote is a way for a group of people in charge, like a government, to vote and decide if they still trust the leader or leaders. If the majority of the group votes "no confidence," it means they don't trust the leader or leaders anymore and they have to resign.

A more thorough explanation:

A no-confidence vote is a formal legal process used by a legislative body to force the resignation of a cabinet or ministry. This is done through a majority vote, which indicates that the legislative body no longer has confidence in the current government.

For example, if the Prime Minister of a country is accused of corruption, the opposition party may call for a no-confidence vote. If the vote passes, the Prime Minister and their cabinet would be forced to resign.

Another example could be if a government fails to pass important legislation or handle a crisis effectively, the legislative body may call for a no-confidence vote to remove them from power.

These examples illustrate how a no-confidence vote can be used to hold a government accountable and ensure that they are acting in the best interest of the people they serve.

no-claim | no-contact order

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
RoaldDahl
16:26
thank you!!!! i hope it means something
pinkandblue
16:31
fart
IrishDinosaur
16:36
Mich R gang lesgooo
Did anyone else get that random get to know nova email?
HopefullyInLawSchool
17:21
Ya it was sent to all YM applicants
starfishies
17:37
Anyone get the NDLS email inviting you to apply for something even though they haven’t made a decision on your app yet
17:38
Better yet I got the email and I was rejected last month
starfishies
17:38
Wtf
starfishies
17:39
and the deadline is in like a week what is this
any cardozo movement?
BatmanBeyond
18:01
Sent a LOCI via portal, but I'm wondering if email would have gotten me a swifter response
BatmanBeyond
18:02
This whole hold/wait-list/reserve system is a headache
loci already?
BatmanBeyond
18:09
If the odds are like 1-2% I don't think it matters much by the numbers
12:11
I got the same NDLS email
OrangeThing
12:18
I think the user profiles are broken
19:29
Any word out of Notre Dame?
19:29
Only the invitation to apply for LSE
19:29
Anyone received a decision from NDLS?
19:50
when did u guys apply that just heard from umich? they havent even glanced at my app yet
0:30
how am i supposed to spy on people when profile links are broken?
Right. Broken links smh
I've been UR since first/second week of Jan, no updates otherwise, is that a bad sign? At or above median LSAT and above 75th gpa.
The profile links are not working for me. anybody else?
13:18
i’m in the same boat mastermonkey but with lower stats. i hope i hear back by mid march
CheeseIsMyLoveLanguage
13:24
@mastermonkey45: Looking at some of the recent decisions in relation to when they went complete, I'd say it's a good sign. It seems many declines were sent within about 5-6 weeks of completion. Given those were applications that were SENT in January, I'd say that means you're still solidly in the running. :)
14:30
Sent an app to OSU in early december and have STILL not heard back
Give it 4 more weeks at least. Everyone in this chat needs to wait longer.
TrumpSucks
19:58
@steelrift99: Same for me at Arizona
TrumpSucks
20:00
It is frustrating when people are admitted who applied after you. But that’s just part of the game I guess
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.