Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

noninterpretivism

Read a random definition: cross-motion

A quick definition of noninterpretivism:

Noninterpretivism is a way of interpreting the Constitution where judges can use current social norms and values to make decisions, instead of just looking at the Constitution's text or history. This means that judges can consider how society has changed over time when making decisions about the Constitution. The opposite of noninterpretivism is interpretivism, where judges only look at the Constitution's original meaning and history.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: Noninterpretivism is a doctrine in constitutional interpretation that allows judges to base their decisions on evolving social norms and values, rather than just the Constitution's text or history. This is different from interpretivism and originalism.

Example: Let's say there is a case about same-sex marriage. A noninterpretivist judge might look at how society's views on same-sex marriage have changed over time and use that as a basis for their decision, rather than just looking at the Constitution's text or history.

Explanation: This example illustrates how a noninterpretivist judge might use evolving social norms and values to make a decision. They are not limited to just the Constitution's text or history, but can also consider how society's views have changed over time.

non-interest-bearing bond | nonintervention

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:12
@RoaldDahl: Likely not however it could mean nothing
RoaldDahl
16:15
So if it means nothing does that mean something?
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:17
Possibly
RoaldDahl
16:26
Cool
RoaldDahl
16:26
thank you!!!! i hope it means something
pinkandblue
16:31
fart
IrishDinosaur
16:36
Mich R gang lesgooo
Did anyone else get that random get to know nova email?
HopefullyInLawSchool
17:21
Ya it was sent to all YM applicants
starfishies
17:37
Anyone get the NDLS email inviting you to apply for something even though they haven’t made a decision on your app yet
17:38
Better yet I got the email and I was rejected last month
starfishies
17:38
Wtf
starfishies
17:39
and the deadline is in like a week what is this
any cardozo movement?
BatmanBeyond
18:01
Sent a LOCI via portal, but I'm wondering if email would have gotten me a swifter response
BatmanBeyond
18:02
This whole hold/wait-list/reserve system is a headache
loci already?
BatmanBeyond
18:09
If the odds are like 1-2% I don't think it matters much by the numbers
12:11
I got the same NDLS email
OrangeThing
12:18
I think the user profiles are broken
19:29
Any word out of Notre Dame?
19:29
Only the invitation to apply for LSE
19:29
Anyone received a decision from NDLS?
19:50
when did u guys apply that just heard from umich? they havent even glanced at my app yet
0:30
how am i supposed to spy on people when profile links are broken?
Right. Broken links smh
I've been UR since first/second week of Jan, no updates otherwise, is that a bad sign? At or above median LSAT and above 75th gpa.
The profile links are not working for me. anybody else?
13:18
i’m in the same boat mastermonkey but with lower stats. i hope i hear back by mid march
CheeseIsMyLoveLanguage
13:24
@mastermonkey45: Looking at some of the recent decisions in relation to when they went complete, I'd say it's a good sign. It seems many declines were sent within about 5-6 weeks of completion. Given those were applications that were SENT in January, I'd say that means you're still solidly in the running. :)
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.