Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

nonresident

Read a random definition: continued meeting

A quick definition of nonresident:

Term: Nonresident

Definition: A nonresident is someone who does not primarily live in one state or country, but has some connection to it. For example, someone who lives in Pennsylvania but works in New York City is a nonresident of New York City. This is important for things like taxes, work, and immigration. If you are a nonresident, you may need to file different forms or paperwork to make sure you are following the rules. The IRS says that a nonresident alien is someone who doesn't have a green card or hasn't been in the US for a long time. If you are a nonresident alien who works in New York City for part of the year, you will need to fill out special forms to pay your taxes.

A more thorough explanation:

A nonresident is a person who does not primarily live in one state or country, but has some connection or interest in it. This status is important in many legal fields, including tax, labor, and immigration.

For example, if someone lives in Pennsylvania but works in New York City, they are considered a nonresident of New York City and must file two state tax returns. Another example is a nonresident alien, which is an individual who does not have a green card or has not spent enough time in the United States to be considered a resident for tax purposes.

If a nonresident alien works in New York City for seven months, they must file Form 1040 with the IRS and Form IT-203 with the New York State Department of Taxation and Finance to report their income and pay taxes.

Overall, being a nonresident means having some connection or interest in a place without primarily living there, and it can have important legal implications.

nonrecurring closing costs | nonsolicitation agreement

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
i've been away for a while what were the most recent waves? any this week?
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.