Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

nonshareholder constituency

Read a random definition: commercially significant noninfringing use

A quick definition of nonshareholder constituency:

error

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: Nonshareholder constituency refers to a group of people who are not shareholders of a corporation but have a stake in the company's business. This group may include employees, customers, suppliers, and the general public. The corporation may legally consider their interests, along with those of shareholders, when making important decisions.

Examples: An example of a nonshareholder constituency is a company's employees. They have a vested interest in the success of the business, as their livelihoods depend on it. Another example is the general public, who may be affected by the company's actions, such as environmental impact or product safety. Suppliers and customers may also be considered part of the nonshareholder constituency.

Explanation: The definition of nonshareholder constituency is illustrated by the examples given. Employees, customers, suppliers, and the general public are all groups of people who have a stake in the success of a corporation but are not shareholders. The corporation may legally consider their interests when making important decisions, such as whether to expand the business or change its product line. This is important because the decisions made by a corporation can have a significant impact on these groups of people, and their interests should be taken into account.

nonservice | nonskip person

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
pinkandblue
16:31
fart
IrishDinosaur
16:36
Mich R gang lesgooo
Did anyone else get that random get to know nova email?
HopefullyInLawSchool
17:21
Ya it was sent to all YM applicants
starfishies
17:37
Anyone get the NDLS email inviting you to apply for something even though they haven’t made a decision on your app yet
17:38
Better yet I got the email and I was rejected last month
starfishies
17:38
Wtf
starfishies
17:39
and the deadline is in like a week what is this
any cardozo movement?
BatmanBeyond
18:01
Sent a LOCI via portal, but I'm wondering if email would have gotten me a swifter response
BatmanBeyond
18:02
This whole hold/wait-list/reserve system is a headache
loci already?
BatmanBeyond
18:09
If the odds are like 1-2% I don't think it matters much by the numbers
12:11
I got the same NDLS email
OrangeThing
12:18
I think the user profiles are broken
19:29
Any word out of Notre Dame?
19:29
Only the invitation to apply for LSE
19:29
Anyone received a decision from NDLS?
19:50
when did u guys apply that just heard from umich? they havent even glanced at my app yet
0:30
how am i supposed to spy on people when profile links are broken?
Right. Broken links smh
I've been UR since first/second week of Jan, no updates otherwise, is that a bad sign? At or above median LSAT and above 75th gpa.
The profile links are not working for me. anybody else?
13:18
i’m in the same boat mastermonkey but with lower stats. i hope i hear back by mid march
CheeseIsMyLoveLanguage
13:24
@mastermonkey45: Looking at some of the recent decisions in relation to when they went complete, I'd say it's a good sign. It seems many declines were sent within about 5-6 weeks of completion. Given those were applications that were SENT in January, I'd say that means you're still solidly in the running. :)
14:30
Sent an app to OSU in early december and have STILL not heard back
Give it 4 more weeks at least. Everyone in this chat needs to wait longer.
TrumpSucks
19:58
@steelrift99: Same for me at Arizona
TrumpSucks
20:00
It is frustrating when people are admitted who applied after you. But that’s just part of the game I guess
was friday a umich R wave?
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.