Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

nullum fecerunt arbitrium

Read a random definition: video piracy

A quick definition of nullum fecerunt arbitrium:

Term: NULLUM FECERUNT ARBITRIUM

Definition: Nullum fecerunt arbitrium is a Latin phrase that means "they never submitted to arbitration." In legal cases where an arbitration award is being enforced, the defendant may use this plea to deny that there was ever an arbitration.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: Nullum fecerunt arbitrium is a Latin term that means "they never submitted to arbitration." It is used in legal cases where the defendant denies that there was an arbitration in an action to enforce an arbitration award.

Example 1: In a dispute between two parties, they agreed to submit their case to an arbitrator. However, one party refused to participate in the arbitration process. In this case, the defendant can use the plea of nullum fecerunt arbitrium to deny that there was an arbitration.

Example 2: A company and its employee had a disagreement over the terms of the employment contract. They decided to settle the dispute through arbitration. However, the employee later claimed that the arbitration was not fair and refused to abide by the decision. In this case, the company can use the plea of nullum fecerunt arbitrium to deny the employee's claim.

These examples illustrate how nullum fecerunt arbitrium can be used in legal cases where one party denies that there was an arbitration. It is a defense that can be used to challenge the validity of an arbitration award.

nullum est erratum | Nullum Tempus Act

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
RoaldDahl
16:15
So if it means nothing does that mean something?
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:17
Possibly
RoaldDahl
16:26
Cool
RoaldDahl
16:26
thank you!!!! i hope it means something
pinkandblue
16:31
fart
IrishDinosaur
16:36
Mich R gang lesgooo
Did anyone else get that random get to know nova email?
HopefullyInLawSchool
17:21
Ya it was sent to all YM applicants
starfishies
17:37
Anyone get the NDLS email inviting you to apply for something even though they haven’t made a decision on your app yet
17:38
Better yet I got the email and I was rejected last month
starfishies
17:38
Wtf
starfishies
17:39
and the deadline is in like a week what is this
any cardozo movement?
BatmanBeyond
18:01
Sent a LOCI via portal, but I'm wondering if email would have gotten me a swifter response
BatmanBeyond
18:02
This whole hold/wait-list/reserve system is a headache
loci already?
BatmanBeyond
18:09
If the odds are like 1-2% I don't think it matters much by the numbers
12:11
I got the same NDLS email
OrangeThing
12:18
I think the user profiles are broken
19:29
Any word out of Notre Dame?
19:29
Only the invitation to apply for LSE
19:29
Anyone received a decision from NDLS?
19:50
when did u guys apply that just heard from umich? they havent even glanced at my app yet
0:30
how am i supposed to spy on people when profile links are broken?
Right. Broken links smh
I've been UR since first/second week of Jan, no updates otherwise, is that a bad sign? At or above median LSAT and above 75th gpa.
The profile links are not working for me. anybody else?
13:18
i’m in the same boat mastermonkey but with lower stats. i hope i hear back by mid march
CheeseIsMyLoveLanguage
13:24
@mastermonkey45: Looking at some of the recent decisions in relation to when they went complete, I'd say it's a good sign. It seems many declines were sent within about 5-6 weeks of completion. Given those were applications that were SENT in January, I'd say that means you're still solidly in the running. :)
14:30
Sent an app to OSU in early december and have STILL not heard back
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.