Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

one-bite rule

Read a random definition: perfecting amendment

A quick definition of one-bite rule:

The one-bite rule is a law that applies to cases where a person is bitten by a domesticated animal, like a dog. It says that the person who was bitten must prove that the owner of the animal knew or should have known that the animal was likely to hurt someone. If the person can prove this and the bite happened on the owner's property, the owner can be held responsible for the bite. Some states have changed or gotten rid of this rule.

A more thorough explanation:

The one-bite rule is a legal concept that often comes up in cases where someone is bitten by a domesticated animal, such as a dog. Under this rule, the person who was bitten must prove that the animal's owner knew or should have known that the animal had a tendency to bite or attack people. If the owner knew or should have known, they may be held responsible for the bite.

For example, let's say that a person owns a dog that has bitten someone in the past. If that person takes the dog to a public park and it bites someone else, the victim may be able to sue the owner under the one-bite rule. The victim would need to prove that the owner knew or should have known that the dog had a tendency to bite people.

It's important to note that the one-bite rule is not a universal law. Some states have modified or rejected the rule, and others have different laws that apply to animal bites. If you are bitten by an animal, it's important to speak with a lawyer who can help you understand your rights and options.

On the stand | one-person, one-vote rule

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
9:31
some people hate him. some people love him, but he a real one: https://youtu.be/w5oEqiVQcF4?t=173
9:32
[kevin oleary]
worthless i trust you implicitly you know what it will happen now.
worthless i trust you implicitly you know what it will happen now.
worthless i trust you implicitly you know what it will happen now.
worthless i trust you implicitly you know what it will happen now.
worthless i trust you implicitly you know what it will happen now.
WorthlessAttractiveZombie
9:34
I mean if Fordham doesn't release today I will purposefully get on a train, go to new york, and then take the stinkiest shit inside the admission office's toilet (potentially clogging it and forcing them to get a plumber)
IS IT ONLY ON MY END WHY DID THAT SEND TEN MILLION TIMES
HELLO
WorthlessAttractiveZombie
9:35
it sent a million times lol
WHAT HAPPENED
yeah i thought you were tweaking for a second
i'm so sorry everyone what the actual fuck this website hates me
WorthlessAttractiveZombie
9:35
Jack's just tweaking on LSD no biggie
to be fair this accurately represents my mental state
election day psychosis coming in hot (fordham)
usc pls pull through .....
i literally just need one A so i can relax before my ED decision
WorthlessAttractiveZombie
9:38
oh that's right USC might release
soapy
9:43
USC still has not looked at my app
WorthlessAttractiveZombie
9:43
when did you submit soapy?
soapy
9:44
10/16
WorthlessAttractiveZombie
9:44
to be fair it took them almost 2 months for me to go under review
soapy
9:44
Feelin a bit stressed, as I've got no date change for Michigan either despite applying 10/7
WorthlessAttractiveZombie
9:45
I have not had a date change either for Mich but I've seen people get in without one so who knows
I applied 9/25 to like 6 schools and some (Houston) have no date change yet so dw
soapy
9:46
But do people get in without addresses going long?
WorthlessAttractiveZombie
9:46
it's tough to tell because a lot of people type out their addresses long to begin with
soapy
9:46
Ah. I didn't. Looking back, my Mich supplement kind of sucks, so there's that
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.