Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

ope exceptionis

Read a random definition: domain-name infringement

A quick definition of ope exceptionis:

Term: OPE EXCEPTIONIS

Definition: Ope exceptionis is a legal term that means "by force of exception" in Latin. It refers to a plea made in a civil case that asserts a peremptory exception, claiming that the document on which the action is based is void. In simpler terms, it is a way for someone being sued to argue that the document being used against them is not valid and therefore the case should be dismissed.

A more thorough explanation:

Ope exceptionis is a Latin term that means "by force of exception." In legal terms, it refers to a plea made in a civil case that asserts a peremptory exception, claiming that the document on which the action is based is void.

An example of ope exceptionis would be a defendant in a breach of contract case claiming that the contract in question is void due to a lack of consideration. The defendant would argue that because there was no exchange of value between the parties, the contract is not legally binding and therefore cannot be the basis for the plaintiff's claim.

Another example would be a defendant in a property dispute case claiming that the deed to the property is void due to a defect in the chain of title. The defendant would argue that because the property was not properly transferred from the previous owner, the current owner does not have legal title to the property and therefore cannot bring a claim against the defendant.

These examples illustrate how a plea of ope exceptionis can be used to challenge the validity of a document on which a legal claim is based. By asserting that the document is void, the defendant can attempt to have the case dismissed or the claim against them invalidated.

ope et consilio | open

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
i've been away for a while what were the most recent waves? any this week?
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.