Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

optional completeness, rule of

Read a random definition: statement of prior-art references

A quick definition of optional completeness, rule of:

Optional Completeness, Rule of: When someone shows part of a writing or says part of something in court, the other side can ask for the rest of it to be read or said too. This is so everyone can understand the whole thing and not just part of it. However, the rest of it can only be read or said if it helps explain the first part and is not unfair or confusing. This rule applies to many types of things, like conversations and written records, but some places have different rules.

A more thorough explanation:

The Optional Completeness, Rule of is an evidentiary rule that states when a party introduces part of a writing or an utterance at trial, the opposing party may require that the remainder of the passage be read to establish the full context.

For example, if a witness testifies about a conversation they had with someone, the opposing party can request that the entire conversation be read or played to the court to provide a complete understanding of the context.

However, there are limitations to this rule. The remainder of the passage must explain the first part, and it cannot be received if it is irrelevant. In most jurisdictions, the remainder is admissible unless its admission would be unfair or misleading.

The rule of optional completeness applies to various types of writings, including account books, conversations, confessions, and opponent's admissions. However, the Federal Rules of Evidence limit the rule to writings and recorded statements.

Overall, the rule of optional completeness ensures that the court has a complete understanding of the context of the evidence presented, which is essential in making a fair and just decision.

option agreement | optional-completeness doctrine

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
Dkk
13:29
I'm at your mommas house rn: https://x.com/Mansavelli_/status/1648073454665572352
triplethread
13:29
im addicted to reacting to all of the decisions
triplethread
13:29
with the emojis
HopefullyInLawSchool
13:29
I shop at Joe
HopefullyInLawSchool
13:29
Joe's
glovediedthisishismom
13:30
i shop at tawget
glovediedthisishismom
13:30
im dawk gawthic maga
triplethread
13:30
i shop at giant eagle
ForDizzyDJoy
13:31
How did i miss Fordham and American’s wave and I applied in september 🙃
13:33
Lol UC Davis took me of ED and put me in RD
13:34
surprised I didnt get straight denied
HopefullyInLawSchool
13:34
they emailed you/
HopefullyInLawSchool
13:34
?
13:35
@HopefullyInLawSchool: Yea, I just got it
i just want a cornell ii :(
13:37
yak you will be fucking shit up at cornell this time next year dw
i love u
13:38
love you too bby
glovediedthisishismom
13:42
what if desantis appoints lara trump and matt gaetz to be floridas senators
Dkk
13:42
Sounds good to me
HopefullyInLawSchool
13:43
@glovediedthisishismom: What if he appoint Ym instead?
HELP
every damn opportunity
13:47
do schools straight reject people from ed or to they always ed-rd if its a no for ED?
HopefullyInLawSchool
13:48
Some schools rject
13:49
Thanks! I couldn't find any reddit thread about it lol
13:49
but just means now I have to wait for the rejection from Davis
glovediedthisishismom
13:53
i just wanna rock
glovediedthisishismom
13:53
bodyadaya
13:53
let it rock
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.