Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

overrule

Read a random definition: term

A quick definition of overrule:

Overrule: Overrule means to reject an objection to evidence in a trial or to overturn a previous decision made by a court. In a trial, the judge can either overrule or sustain an objection made by an attorney. If the judge overrules the objection, it means the evidence is allowed. If the judge sustains the objection, it means the evidence is not allowed. In an appellate court, overruling a case means that a previous decision is no longer the law. For example, in the case of Brown v. Board of Education, the Supreme Court overruled a previous decision and made a new rule that separate schools for different races were not allowed.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: Overrule is a legal term used in two situations. The first is when a lawyer objects to evidence being used in a trial. The judge can either overrule or sustain the objection. If the judge overrules the objection, the evidence is allowed. If the judge sustains the objection, the evidence is not allowed. The second situation is when an appeals court decides that a previous court decision is wrong and should not be followed anymore. This is called overruling a precedent.

Example 1: During a trial, a lawyer objects to a witness's testimony because it is hearsay (meaning the witness is repeating something they heard from someone else, not something they personally experienced). The judge overrules the objection and allows the testimony because it is important to the case.

Example 2: In the past, a court decision said that it was okay to have separate schools for black and white students as long as the schools were equal. This decision was called Plessy v. Ferguson. Later, in the case Brown v. Board of Education, the Supreme Court overruled the Plessy decision and said that separate schools based on race were not okay. This meant that the Plessy decision was no longer the law and the Brown decision was the new law.

These examples show how overrule is used in different legal situations. In the first example, the judge had to decide whether or not to allow evidence in a trial. In the second example, the Supreme Court had to decide whether or not to change a previous court decision. In both cases, the decision to overrule or not had a big impact on the outcome of the case.

overcharge | Overt act

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
i've been away for a while what were the most recent waves? any this week?
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.