Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

parental-rights doctrine

Read a random definition: control stock

A quick definition of parental-rights doctrine:

The parental-rights doctrine is the idea that a child's custody should usually be given to their parent who is considered fit to take care of them, rather than someone else. However, this preference can be challenged if it is proven that it is not in the child's best interest. This rule is also known as the parental-preference doctrine, parental-superior-rights doctrine, or parental-presumption rule. It is important to consider what is best for the child when deciding custody.

A more thorough explanation:

The parental-rights doctrine, also known as the parental-preference doctrine, is a principle that states that custody of a minor child should usually be given to a fit parent instead of another person. This means that if a parent is deemed fit to care for their child, they have a legal right to custody over anyone else.

However, this preference can be challenged if it is proven that it is not in the best interests of the child. For example, if a parent has a history of abuse or neglect, their parental rights may be terminated, and custody may be given to another person.

Overall, the parental-rights doctrine is based on the belief that parents have a fundamental right to raise their children, but this right is not absolute and can be overridden if it is not in the child's best interests.

Example: A divorced couple is fighting for custody of their child. The court will usually give preference to the fit parent, but if one parent can prove that the other is unfit or that it is not in the child's best interests to be with that parent, custody may be awarded to the other parent or a third party.

parental rights | parental-superior-rights doctrine

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:03
@UnderRepresentedTryhard: Yes only for YM applicants tho
RoaldDahl
16:05
dodged the mich r wave what does this mean
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:06
it means you will not be rejected today and may be accepted or WL in the future
Just got my Michigan rejection
BookwormBroker
16:10
same
RoaldDahl
16:10
@HopefullyInLawSchool: what if i already got rejected. does it mean anything
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:12
@RoaldDahl: Likely not however it could mean nothing
RoaldDahl
16:15
So if it means nothing does that mean something?
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:17
Possibly
RoaldDahl
16:26
Cool
RoaldDahl
16:26
thank you!!!! i hope it means something
pinkandblue
16:31
fart
IrishDinosaur
16:36
Mich R gang lesgooo
Did anyone else get that random get to know nova email?
HopefullyInLawSchool
17:21
Ya it was sent to all YM applicants
starfishies
17:37
Anyone get the NDLS email inviting you to apply for something even though they haven’t made a decision on your app yet
17:38
Better yet I got the email and I was rejected last month
starfishies
17:38
Wtf
starfishies
17:39
and the deadline is in like a week what is this
any cardozo movement?
BatmanBeyond
18:01
Sent a LOCI via portal, but I'm wondering if email would have gotten me a swifter response
BatmanBeyond
18:02
This whole hold/wait-list/reserve system is a headache
loci already?
BatmanBeyond
18:09
If the odds are like 1-2% I don't think it matters much by the numbers
12:11
I got the same NDLS email
OrangeThing
12:18
I think the user profiles are broken
19:29
Any word out of Notre Dame?
19:29
Only the invitation to apply for LSE
19:29
Anyone received a decision from NDLS?
19:50
when did u guys apply that just heard from umich? they havent even glanced at my app yet
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.