Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

parental-rights doctrine

Read a random definition: expectation interest

A quick definition of parental-rights doctrine:

The parental-rights doctrine is the idea that a child's custody should usually be given to their parent who is considered fit to take care of them, rather than someone else. However, this preference can be challenged if it is proven that it is not in the child's best interest. This rule is also known as the parental-preference doctrine, parental-superior-rights doctrine, or parental-presumption rule. It is important to consider what is best for the child when deciding custody.

A more thorough explanation:

The parental-rights doctrine, also known as the parental-preference doctrine, is a principle that states that custody of a minor child should usually be given to a fit parent instead of another person. This means that if a parent is deemed fit to care for their child, they have a legal right to custody over anyone else.

However, this preference can be challenged if it is proven that it is not in the best interests of the child. For example, if a parent has a history of abuse or neglect, their parental rights may be terminated, and custody may be given to another person.

Overall, the parental-rights doctrine is based on the belief that parents have a fundamental right to raise their children, but this right is not absolute and can be overridden if it is not in the child's best interests.

Example: A divorced couple is fighting for custody of their child. The court will usually give preference to the fit parent, but if one parent can prove that the other is unfit or that it is not in the child's best interests to be with that parent, custody may be awarded to the other parent or a third party.

parental rights | parental-superior-rights doctrine

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
Dkk
19:42
SEO is big money
2016 pushed the conservative party into populism irreversibly
Dkk
19:43
Maybe, but if this is populism, then every election is populist.
19:43
@Dkk: yeah register 1 website and every swinging tom dick and harry calls/emails/texts to 'help with seo'. like bruh, if YOU found it, what i am doing is working
Dkk
19:43
Indeed!
19:48
wasp, i think people are hopeful for a gov who at least attempts to care about the common man
MIAMI A
[] AromaticTroubledDormouse
20:55
How does one know if they are UR1 or UR2?
[] AromaticTroubledDormouse
20:56
CONGRATS MACAQUE!
TY
got a random stanford email and almost had a heart attack
ALSO CONGRATS!
Congrats1!
21:15
Miami A, yall I'm so excited I could cry.
21:15
Feel like I can finally stop holding my breath!! Whew!!!
[] baddestbunny
22:16
every time I get accosted by a strange man who follows me around because my male coworkers were too busy talking to walk me back to my car I get closer to saying we need to bring back traditional gender roles
Dkk
22:32
Nice! @Macaque
Dkk
22:32
@Aromatic, Have to guess.
Dkk
22:33
That sucks @Bunny do you have to go to the hospital?
[] baddestbunny
22:40
I said accosted not assaulted
23:35
guys. my notre dame address just went long is this good or bad
1a2b3c4d26z
23:37
Oooooo me too
23:37
omg is this good or bad
Dkk
23:47
Idk if gender roles are gunna fix that then.
23:49
it looks like most people who applied in october last cycle didn't get a decision until january... does it even mean anything that our addresses went long??
hows ED 2 compared to ED 1?
Dkk
0:10
No idea
windyMagician
0:34
reporting live to say my ndls address also went long
does it mean anything ^
Dkk
2:21
NDLS and Fordham took a very long time last year. It's good info for people to know.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.