Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

per aes et libram

Read a random definition: de domo reparanda

A quick definition of per aes et libram:

Term: PER AES ET LIBRAM

Definition: Per aes et libram is a Latin phrase used in Roman law to refer to a fictitious sale called mancipation. During mancipation, the buyer would strike the scales with a piece of bronze or copper and give it to the seller as a symbol of the price. Mancipation was a legal formality for transferring property by either an actual or a simulated purchase. It required the presence of the thing being conveyed and five adult male citizens acting as witnesses.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: Per aes et libram is a Latin term used in Roman law that means "by bronze (or copper) and scales." It refers to a fictitious sale in a mancipation where the purchaser strikes the scales with a piece of bronze or copper and gives it to the seller as a symbol of the price.

Mancipation is a legal formality for transferring property by either an actual or a simulated purchase. It is a formal conveyance in the guise of a sale. The formality required the presence of the thing being conveyed (res mancipi), and of five adult male citizens acting as witnesses. Another person (the purchaser) would strike the scales with a piece of bronze or copper and give it to the seller as a symbol of the price.

For example, if someone wanted to transfer ownership of a piece of land to another person, they would go through the mancipation process. The purchaser would strike the scales with a piece of bronze or copper and give it to the seller as a symbol of the price. This would signify the transfer of ownership from the seller to the purchaser.

Overall, per aes et libram and mancipation were important legal processes in ancient Rome for transferring ownership of property.

per aequipollens | per alium stetit

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
17:34
@LawIsForPeasants: I just want you to know that: you matter, you are important, and finally, I am proud of you. :D
That is so fucking cringe and leave me alone
llama i appreciate you
17:35
@LawIsForPeasants: while charlie kirk's facts do not care about your feelings, just know that I do!
texaslawhopefully
17:36
@Dkk: Fair enough, but if you're using political philosophy to defend Trump, it's hard to reconcile him as a candidate with very relevant classic political theory, like Locke's individual rights and limited government as illustrated in the 2nd treatise, or the constitutional framework limiting executive power (e.g., Federalist 51). Trump's disregard for constitutional checks and populist rhetoric directly is in tension with our very foundational principles.
Dkk
17:36
@SplitterusClitterus: sounds good. Trying to paint a wine glass rn anyway after I just woke up.
Dkk
17:37
@texaslawhopefully: Psssh I would not use gender relations as a way to defend Trump. He does not go that route and I think literally him and everyone in their cabinet has no idea what those are. I mean, just look at how many divorces Elon and Trump have had.
texaslawhopefully
17:38
Was that not why you said you voted for him?
17:38
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: can I ask what “2 years retroactive withdrawals” means
17:39
elon and trump realize there are many fish in the sea, and sometimes u can't just 'make it work'
@sadpadresfan: grades changed to W for two consecutive years of classes
Dkk
17:39
Nah, I did not vote. I have never voted in my life because I have a lot of issues with it. 4 years ago my mom filled out my ballot for me because she wanted to but I do not vote.
17:40
based fellow non voter
@llama i do not need or desire external validation.
17:40
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: ah I see
17:41
@LawIsForPeasants: ok, sorry, I will not bother u while u 'self validate yourself in the corner' my bad.
@llama: im self validating so hard rn
17:42
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: thats very ithica of you, wasp.
texaslawhopefully
17:44
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: Out of curiosity, since you're in law school and prolly know fedsoc people, how conservative do you think you have to be to be in fedsoc? Like is a david french sort of conservative fairly common in it, or is it the maga type people mainly
i dont interact with any fedsoc people, but i dont know any maga people at cornell. but the student body overwhelmingly leans left, so i think they might not be comfortable showing that theyre conservative if that makes sense?
one time a guy kind of crashed out about masks in conlaw
but that's the most ive seen
texaslawhopefully
17:47
Yeah, that does make sense. I would like to join fedsoc, but I'm also, clearly, very opposed to Trump and where the GOP has gone.
if you join fedsoc and go for clerking and eventually become a judge. you will be pinholed into maga politics as long as maga is the predominant conservative stance
Idk if @irishdinosaur is online but congrats on UCLA!!
next you will say you want to be the first black kkk grand wizard
@SaddestPortlander: tysm!!!!
texaslawhopefully
18:00
yes congrats irishdinosaur! that's incredible
18:03
@IrishDinosaur: you inspire me and my completely misguided cope that I might ever get into UCLA
Super big congrats irish!!!
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.