8:59
i know im getting rejected but i sent my app to georgetown on december 14th and not a single update
Warning
Info
Warning
Info
LSDefine
Simple English definitions for legal terms
Piercing the Corporate Veil
Read a random definition: audit letter
A quick definition of Piercing the Corporate Veil:
Piercing the corporate veil is when a court holds a corporation's shareholders or directors personally responsible for the corporation's actions or debts. This usually happens when the corporation has done something really bad, like mixing personal and corporate money or not having enough money when it started. Creditors can also try to pierce the veil if they think the corporation was created just to avoid paying them. Each state has different rules for when the veil can be pierced, but generally, it's not easy to do. Courts like limited liability because it helps investors and the economy, so they only do it in extreme cases.
A more thorough explanation:
Definition: Piercing the corporate veil refers to a legal situation where a court holds a corporation's shareholders or directors personally liable for the corporation's actions or debts, setting aside the limited liability protection. This is usually done when there has been serious misconduct, such as abusing the corporation or undercapitalization at the time of incorporation. The law varies by state, and courts have a strong presumption against piercing the corporate veil.
Example: Let's say a corporation is formed with the intention of avoiding liability for a risky business venture. The corporation is undercapitalized and the shareholders intermingle their personal and corporate assets. If the business fails and creditors are left with unpaid debts, they may try to pierce the corporate veil and hold the shareholders personally liable for the debts.
Explanation: This example illustrates how a corporation can be abused to avoid liability, leading to the piercing of the corporate veil. The shareholders' personal assets may be at risk if the court finds that the corporation was used as a mere instrumentality to perpetrate a fraud or promote injustice.
Example: In another scenario, a corporation is formed with proper formalities and conducts business in good faith. However, one of the shareholders engages in fraudulent activities, using the corporation to perpetrate the fraud. Creditors may try to pierce the corporate veil and hold the shareholder personally liable for the debts.
Explanation: This example shows how a shareholder's misconduct can lead to the piercing of the corporate veil, even if the corporation itself was not involved in any wrongdoing. The court may find that the shareholder used the corporation as an agent to conduct business in an individual capacity, making the principal vicariously liable.