Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

praesumitur pro negante

Read a random definition: CPD

A quick definition of praesumitur pro negante:

Term: PRAESUMITUR PRO NEGANTE

Definition: When there is a tie in votes on a decision, the House of Lords assumes that the decision is against the proposal. This means that if there is no clear majority, the proposal is considered to be rejected.

A more thorough explanation:

praesumitur pro negante (pronounced pri-zyoo-muh-tur proh ni-gan-tee) is a Latin phrase that means "it is presumed for the negative." This is a rule used by the House of Lords when the votes are equal on a motion.

For example, if there are 100 members in the House of Lords and 50 vote for a motion while 50 vote against it, the motion will be defeated because of the rule of praesumitur pro negante. This means that the House of Lords will presume that the negative side (those who voted against the motion) should win because they are the ones who are opposing the motion.

Another example is in a court case where the burden of proof is on the prosecution. If the prosecution cannot prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant is guilty, then the defendant is presumed innocent. This is an application of the rule of praesumitur pro negante.

These examples illustrate how the rule of praesumitur pro negante works. It means that when there is doubt or uncertainty, the side that is opposing something is given the benefit of the doubt. This is because it is often easier to prove that something is false or wrong than it is to prove that it is true or correct.

praestatio culpae levis | praesumptio

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
RoaldDahl
16:15
So if it means nothing does that mean something?
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:17
Possibly
RoaldDahl
16:26
Cool
RoaldDahl
16:26
thank you!!!! i hope it means something
pinkandblue
16:31
fart
IrishDinosaur
16:36
Mich R gang lesgooo
Did anyone else get that random get to know nova email?
HopefullyInLawSchool
17:21
Ya it was sent to all YM applicants
starfishies
17:37
Anyone get the NDLS email inviting you to apply for something even though they haven’t made a decision on your app yet
17:38
Better yet I got the email and I was rejected last month
starfishies
17:38
Wtf
starfishies
17:39
and the deadline is in like a week what is this
any cardozo movement?
BatmanBeyond
18:01
Sent a LOCI via portal, but I'm wondering if email would have gotten me a swifter response
BatmanBeyond
18:02
This whole hold/wait-list/reserve system is a headache
loci already?
BatmanBeyond
18:09
If the odds are like 1-2% I don't think it matters much by the numbers
12:11
I got the same NDLS email
OrangeThing
12:18
I think the user profiles are broken
19:29
Any word out of Notre Dame?
19:29
Only the invitation to apply for LSE
19:29
Anyone received a decision from NDLS?
19:50
when did u guys apply that just heard from umich? they havent even glanced at my app yet
0:30
how am i supposed to spy on people when profile links are broken?
Right. Broken links smh
I've been UR since first/second week of Jan, no updates otherwise, is that a bad sign? At or above median LSAT and above 75th gpa.
The profile links are not working for me. anybody else?
13:18
i’m in the same boat mastermonkey but with lower stats. i hope i hear back by mid march
CheeseIsMyLoveLanguage
13:24
@mastermonkey45: Looking at some of the recent decisions in relation to when they went complete, I'd say it's a good sign. It seems many declines were sent within about 5-6 weeks of completion. Given those were applications that were SENT in January, I'd say that means you're still solidly in the running. :)
14:30
Sent an app to OSU in early december and have STILL not heard back
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.