Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

praesumitur pro negante

Read a random definition: remittit damna

A quick definition of praesumitur pro negante:

Term: PRAESUMITUR PRO NEGANTE

Definition: When there is a tie in votes on a decision, the House of Lords assumes that the decision is against the proposal. This means that if there is no clear majority, the proposal is considered to be rejected.

A more thorough explanation:

praesumitur pro negante (pronounced pri-zyoo-muh-tur proh ni-gan-tee) is a Latin phrase that means "it is presumed for the negative." This is a rule used by the House of Lords when the votes are equal on a motion.

For example, if there are 100 members in the House of Lords and 50 vote for a motion while 50 vote against it, the motion will be defeated because of the rule of praesumitur pro negante. This means that the House of Lords will presume that the negative side (those who voted against the motion) should win because they are the ones who are opposing the motion.

Another example is in a court case where the burden of proof is on the prosecution. If the prosecution cannot prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant is guilty, then the defendant is presumed innocent. This is an application of the rule of praesumitur pro negante.

These examples illustrate how the rule of praesumitur pro negante works. It means that when there is doubt or uncertainty, the side that is opposing something is given the benefit of the doubt. This is because it is often easier to prove that something is false or wrong than it is to prove that it is true or correct.

praestatio culpae levis | praesumptio

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
woof
texaslawhopefully
17:08
I've seen some that could be as high as 7k though
17:08
@jackfrost11770: ya prolly don't buy any lotto tickets tonite
get on that trump coin before the rug pull lol
Dkk
17:09
@BigStrongBug: I don't consider myself a one issue voter but if I had to pick one it would be gender relations.
i am a one issue voter for the economy, which is why i voted harris
texaslawhopefully
17:10
Here's a fairly well respected estimate fruitybat: The proposed tariffs could cost consumers an additional $2,500 to $7,600 a year per household, according to estimates, said Jonathan Gold, vice president of supply chain and customs policy for the National Retail Federation.
i am a voter so i voted
17:11
Lol what does gender relations mean
17:11
Like are you anti gay marriage?
texaslawhopefully
17:11
@Dkk: So you care about gender relations over the Constitution, institutional stability, the economy, political norms, etc.?
blue collar trump voters are gonna blame anything but him anyway when the price of their household consumption goes through the roof. I wonder how they'll spin that narrative.
17:11
Or are you an all inclusive hater and include trans folks too
texaslawhopefully
17:12
Even if you have conservative social values you still shouldn't like Trump lol, but that's a whole diff convo
I love when people prefer putting not talking about gender in schools at the top of the agenda instead of dealing with school shootings
this is going to blow your mind but once you realize women and men are more similar than different you will drown in pussy or dick
17:12
@HopefullyInLawSchool: $45k @ KS is really good. $145k is to attend it is not a bad deal
facts knowledgeable
Also love how he put an EO to leave the Paris climate agreement in the midst of the LA wildfires and places who haven’t gotten snow in 15 years now getting storms
@llama: it would only be 17,000 ish per year
17:15
yeah and i think after 1L u get in state? not certain
I dont think so based on my very brief research
17:16
hmm I know some school offer that in their offer (I also believe KS does not negotiate) but I wonder which schools would reconsider with a condition of in state after 1L yr?
Dkk
17:17
@texaslawhopefully: Not necessarily but I believe what Aristotle used to say. He used to say you could not have a functioning political system if you can not get gender relations right. Or essentially that.
KS does negotiate! I got an email saying theyre doing it for the first time this year
its rather limited but its not nothing
17:18
@HopefullyInLawSchool: noted, thanks for the intel. I know we joke around but all things conidered, KS is goated
Dkk
17:18
@BigStrongBug: Nah aristotle only applies gender as a role which I think either sex could fulfill. My issue with Trump's EO to limit things to only sex but I am fine with him doing it for now.
Yeah and Aristotle old as hell boy he would’ve died of hysteria after learning what the internet and tiktok is
Dkk
17:19
@SplitterusClitterus: I think some school shootings could have been prevented if gender relations were better.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.