Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

prenatal tort

Read a random definition: Electronic Funds Transfer Act

A quick definition of prenatal tort:

A prenatal tort is when someone hurts a baby before it is born. A long time ago, people couldn't sue for this kind of harm. But now, if a baby is born alive and can survive outside of its mother's body, it can sue for injuries it got while still in the womb. Some places even let babies sue for harm they suffered before they were able to survive outside of their mother's body. There are different kinds of lawsuits for prenatal harm, like personal injury, wrongful birth, wrongful life, and wrongful pregnancy. The amount of money someone can get for harm to a baby before it is born depends on where they live and what kind of harm was done.

A more thorough explanation:

A prenatal tort is a type of tort that involves harm to an unborn child. In the past, courts did not recognize the rights of unborn children to bring lawsuits for injuries sustained while in the womb. However, in 1946, the case of Bonbrest v. Kotz established that if a child is born alive and viable, they may bring an action for injuries sustained while in the womb of their mother.

  • Personal Injury: If a child is born alive and suffered injuries while in the womb due to the negligence of a third party, they may have a right to bring a lawsuit for damages.
  • Wrongful Birth: If a child is born with a genetic defect that could have been detected through prenatal testing, the parents may bring a lawsuit against the healthcare provider for failing to diagnose the defect.
  • Wrongful Life: If a child is born with a severe disability or impairment, they may bring a lawsuit against the healthcare provider for failing to diagnose the condition or provide appropriate treatment.
  • Wrongful Conception/Pregnancy: If a child is born as a result of a failed contraceptive or sterilization procedure, the parents may bring a lawsuit against the healthcare provider for negligence.

These examples illustrate how prenatal torts can arise in a variety of situations and can involve different types of damages, such as medical expenses, emotional distress, and loss of income.

Premium | Prenuptial agreement

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
texaslawhopefully
22:30
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That all sounds great. It sounds like it has fairly diverse cuisine for a smaller city
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.