Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

Prior appropriation doctrine

Read a random definition: defective performance

A quick definition of Prior appropriation doctrine:

The prior appropriation doctrine is a rule that says the first person to use or divert water for a good reason gets to keep using it. This means that if someone starts using water from a river or stream before anyone else, they have the right to keep using it. It's like being first in line for something - you get to go first and no one can take your spot.

A more thorough explanation:

Prior appropriation doctrine

The prior appropriation doctrine is a rule that determines water rights based on the priority of beneficial use. This means that the first person to use or divert water for a beneficial purpose can acquire individual rights to the water.

For example, if a farmer diverts water from a river to irrigate their crops, they may acquire the right to continue using that water for irrigation. If another person downstream wants to use the same water for a different purpose, such as drinking water, they may not be able to do so if the farmer's prior use takes priority.

Another example could be a mining company that diverts water from a stream to use in their operations. If a recreational fisherman downstream wants to use the same water for fishing, they may not be able to do so if the mining company's prior use takes priority.

The prior appropriation doctrine is based on the idea that the first person to use water for a beneficial purpose has a right to continue using that water. This means that if there is a limited amount of water available, those who have acquired rights to the water through prior appropriation have priority over those who have not. The examples illustrate how this doctrine can affect different users of water and how it can be used to allocate water rights.

Principal Register | Prior art

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:06
it means you will not be rejected today and may be accepted or WL in the future
Just got my Michigan rejection
BookwormBroker
16:10
same
RoaldDahl
16:10
@HopefullyInLawSchool: what if i already got rejected. does it mean anything
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:12
@RoaldDahl: Likely not however it could mean nothing
RoaldDahl
16:15
So if it means nothing does that mean something?
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:17
Possibly
RoaldDahl
16:26
Cool
RoaldDahl
16:26
thank you!!!! i hope it means something
pinkandblue
16:31
fart
IrishDinosaur
16:36
Mich R gang lesgooo
Did anyone else get that random get to know nova email?
HopefullyInLawSchool
17:21
Ya it was sent to all YM applicants
starfishies
17:37
Anyone get the NDLS email inviting you to apply for something even though they haven’t made a decision on your app yet
17:38
Better yet I got the email and I was rejected last month
starfishies
17:38
Wtf
starfishies
17:39
and the deadline is in like a week what is this
any cardozo movement?
BatmanBeyond
18:01
Sent a LOCI via portal, but I'm wondering if email would have gotten me a swifter response
BatmanBeyond
18:02
This whole hold/wait-list/reserve system is a headache
loci already?
BatmanBeyond
18:09
If the odds are like 1-2% I don't think it matters much by the numbers
12:11
I got the same NDLS email
OrangeThing
12:18
I think the user profiles are broken
19:29
Any word out of Notre Dame?
19:29
Only the invitation to apply for LSE
19:29
Anyone received a decision from NDLS?
19:50
when did u guys apply that just heard from umich? they havent even glanced at my app yet
0:30
how am i supposed to spy on people when profile links are broken?
Right. Broken links smh
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.