LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

privignus

Read a random definition: accipere

A quick definition of privignus:

Privignus is a fancy word that means a stepson. It's used in Roman and civil law to describe a son of your husband or wife from a previous marriage. So, if your mom or dad gets married again and their new spouse has a son, that son would be your privignus.

A more thorough explanation:

Privignus

A privignus is a stepson, which means a son of one's husband or wife from a previous marriage.

John's wife had a son from her previous marriage. He is John's privignus.
When Mary married Tom, she became a stepmother to his two children. Mary's relationship with Tom's children is that of a privignus.

The examples show that a privignus is a stepson, which means a son of one's husband or wife from a previous marriage. In the first example, John's wife had a son from her previous marriage, and that son is John's privignus. In the second example, Mary became a stepmother to Tom's children when they got married, and her relationship with them is that of a privignus.

privigna | privileged

General

General chat about the legal profession.

General >T14 Off Topic

👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎

VolatileClumsyAcolyte

13:59

is there like a cheat sheet or a study guide type of thing for specific forms of questions? I remember I struggled the most with NA/SA/PSA

KnowledgeableRitzyWasp

13:59

@soap: if you get above a 175 you should just reapply because you’d probably be competitive for penn nyu and cls at that point with scholly money

VolatileClumsyAcolyte

14:00

I scored 156 on my first LSAT in August, I cancelled that and retook it immediately in September and got 163. Do yall think I can cross into 170's if I start studying from like january to summer

VolatileClumsyAcolyte

14:00

because i've heard that any score increase after 165 is just as hard as from 145 to 160

soap

14:01

I've been told by my parents that I cannot reapply because I have the full ride to UMN and so I better take whatever I can get lol

texaslawhopefully

14:01

I’m going to have to disagree with soap on the point of doing the hardest questions first. I think it’s just a general waste of time to over complicate your strategy. You’re going to have do all the questions anyone. Ignore the clock and focus on one question at a time.

KnowledgeableRitzyWasp

14:01

@VolatileClumsyAcolyte: it gets harder to increase your score as you go up, but if you work hard and consistently work on your mistakes it’s entirely possible you break 170

VolatileClumsyAcolyte

14:01

got it thank u guys

KnowledgeableRitzyWasp

14:01

@soap: lol oh well just get top 10% a umn and then transfer to harvard because you come from a grade deflated undergrad and law school will be easy for you

soap

14:02

I think the order in which you do questions is a matter of personal preference. In PTs I've always scored better doing the hardest ones first, but that's just because it reduces the stress personally lol

soap

14:02

I guess since I'm paying for all this anyhow I could just wait and reapply lmao

texaslawhopefully

14:03

Yeah soap if you get a 175+, I would 100 percent reapply

KnowledgeableRitzyWasp

14:03

hahahahah sure if you’re set on t14 it’s entirely attainable for you

texaslawhopefully

14:03

If your parents aren’t helping at all, they don’t have much of a say

llama

14:08

^valid pt

VolatileClumsyAcolyte

14:21

my mom is so involved in my application proccess she wanted to cater my personal statement to what she believed would make most impact on adcom.

VolatileClumsyAcolyte

14:21

she is helping pay for it but even if so, they shouldnt be too involved

VolatileClumsyAcolyte

14:22

shes a war veteran so she wanted me to spend significant portion of my ps talking about how much her journey affected and inspired me so i ignored her to the fullest by simply saying "ps is about me not you"

VolatileClumsyAcolyte

14:24

speaking of test prep, any 7sage alternatives that include explanations without "youre dumb if u dont get this"

i-need-top

14:25

twitter is making me so mad i may have to get rid of it

texaslawhopefully

14:25

I’m going to get dogged on for saying this, but LSAT Demon has fairly good explanations

i-need-top

14:25

i had demon for a month and they have flushed out written explanations that helpo

i-need-top

14:26

7sage explanations are so sucky i gotta watch a vid of a dude eliminiating an answer choice with 2 seconds of explainaing why

VolatileClumsyAcolyte

14:29

dude, i feel like 7sage guy speedruns thru the whole test.

i-need-top

14:30

the vids are 80% him reading the stimulus out loud then he devotes 4 seconds to each answer choice i swear

i-need-top

14:31

i shake my fist to the sky]

VolatileClumsyAcolyte

14:31

LOL thats so true...they were good for LG but now i dont see the point... applied to GULC mid oct, havent received II or anything, so i HAVE to be cooked, right?

windyMagician

14:35

my parents didn’t know i was applying to law school until i got in. it’s great being old

windyMagician

14:35

my dad barely knows the difference between mich and umn

VolatileClumsyAcolyte

14:36

yeah, my parent thinks cardozo is better than fordham because someone she knows got in fordham LLM and that person is plain stupid so fordham HAS to be bad

LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.