Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

property tort

Read a random definition: derivation of citizenship

A quick definition of property tort:

A property tort is when someone does something to damage or interfere with someone else's property without permission. This can include going onto someone's land without asking, touching or using someone else's things without permission, or taking something that belongs to someone else and not giving it back. It's like breaking the rules of sharing and respecting other people's things.

A more thorough explanation:

A property tort is a type of legal wrong that involves damage to someone's property. It occurs when one person unlawfully interferes with another person's right to enjoy their private property. Property torts are different from personal torts because they involve property rights rather than personal rights.

  • Trespass on land: This occurs when someone enters another person's land without permission. For example, if someone walks onto your property without your permission, they are committing a trespass on your land.
  • Trespass to chattels: This happens when someone handles or uses items that belong to another person without their permission. For example, if someone takes your bike without your permission, they are committing a trespass to chattels.
  • Conversion: This occurs when someone takes possession of another person's property with the intent of not returning it. For example, if someone takes your car and refuses to give it back, they are committing conversion.

These examples illustrate how property torts involve interference with someone's property rights. They show how someone's property can be damaged or taken without their permission, which can cause harm and financial loss.

Property tax | propria persona

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
i've been away for a while what were the most recent waves? any this week?
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.