Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

prorogatio de loco in locum

Read a random definition: cogent

A quick definition of prorogatio de loco in locum:

Term: PROROGATIO DE LOCO IN LOCUM

Definition: Prorogatio de loco in locum is a legal term that refers to the transfer of jurisdiction from one place to another. This means that a court or legal authority can continue to exercise its power in a different location than where it was originally established.

For example, if a court has jurisdiction over a case in one city but the case is moved to another city, the court can still hear and decide the case in the new location. This is known as prorogatio de loco in locum.

Overall, prorogatio de loco in locum is a legal concept that allows for the continuation of legal proceedings in a different location than where they were originally established.

A more thorough explanation:

PROROGATIO DE LOCO IN LOCUM

Prorogatio de loco in locum is a Latin legal term that refers to the prorogation or extension of jurisdiction from one place to another.

An example of prorogatio de loco in locum is when a court case is transferred from one jurisdiction to another. For instance, if a case is filed in a state court but the defendant requests that it be moved to a federal court, the jurisdiction is prorogated from the state court to the federal court.

Another example is when a judge is assigned to a case in a different jurisdiction. For example, if a judge from one state is asked to preside over a case in another state, the jurisdiction is prorogated from the original state to the new state.

Prorogatio de loco in locum is a legal term that describes the extension of jurisdiction from one place to another. The examples provided illustrate how this term is used in practice. In both cases, the jurisdiction of a court or judge is transferred from one location to another. This can happen for a variety of reasons, such as to ensure a fair trial or to consolidate cases that are related to each other.

pro re nata | prorogatio de tempore in tempus

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
That is so fucking cringe and leave me alone
llama i appreciate you
17:35
@LawIsForPeasants: while charlie kirk's facts do not care about your feelings, just know that I do!
texaslawhopefully
17:36
@Dkk: Fair enough, but if you're using political philosophy to defend Trump, it's hard to reconcile him as a candidate with very relevant classic political theory, like Locke's individual rights and limited government as illustrated in the 2nd treatise, or the constitutional framework limiting executive power (e.g., Federalist 51). Trump's disregard for constitutional checks and populist rhetoric directly is in tension with our very foundational principles.
Dkk
17:36
@SplitterusClitterus: sounds good. Trying to paint a wine glass rn anyway after I just woke up.
Dkk
17:37
@texaslawhopefully: Psssh I would not use gender relations as a way to defend Trump. He does not go that route and I think literally him and everyone in their cabinet has no idea what those are. I mean, just look at how many divorces Elon and Trump have had.
texaslawhopefully
17:38
Was that not why you said you voted for him?
17:38
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: can I ask what “2 years retroactive withdrawals” means
17:39
elon and trump realize there are many fish in the sea, and sometimes u can't just 'make it work'
@sadpadresfan: grades changed to W for two consecutive years of classes
Dkk
17:39
Nah, I did not vote. I have never voted in my life because I have a lot of issues with it. 4 years ago my mom filled out my ballot for me because she wanted to but I do not vote.
17:40
based fellow non voter
@llama i do not need or desire external validation.
17:40
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: ah I see
17:41
@LawIsForPeasants: ok, sorry, I will not bother u while u 'self validate yourself in the corner' my bad.
@llama: im self validating so hard rn
17:42
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: thats very ithica of you, wasp.
texaslawhopefully
17:44
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: Out of curiosity, since you're in law school and prolly know fedsoc people, how conservative do you think you have to be to be in fedsoc? Like is a david french sort of conservative fairly common in it, or is it the maga type people mainly
i dont interact with any fedsoc people, but i dont know any maga people at cornell. but the student body overwhelmingly leans left, so i think they might not be comfortable showing that theyre conservative if that makes sense?
one time a guy kind of crashed out about masks in conlaw
but that's the most ive seen
texaslawhopefully
17:47
Yeah, that does make sense. I would like to join fedsoc, but I'm also, clearly, very opposed to Trump and where the GOP has gone.
if you join fedsoc and go for clerking and eventually become a judge. you will be pinholed into maga politics as long as maga is the predominant conservative stance
Idk if @irishdinosaur is online but congrats on UCLA!!
next you will say you want to be the first black kkk grand wizard
@SaddestPortlander: tysm!!!!
texaslawhopefully
18:00
yes congrats irishdinosaur! that's incredible
18:03
@IrishDinosaur: you inspire me and my completely misguided cope that I might ever get into UCLA
Super big congrats irish!!!
Also pretty much agree with Wasp. I think it’s more about getting the political/judicial position as a Fedsoc member that will likely require a stance siding with whatever the conservative majority party is at that time.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.