Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

public charge

Read a random definition: triple trigger

A quick definition of public charge:

Public charge refers to when an immigrant receives public benefits that could make them ineligible to become a permanent resident. The government has the power to define what counts as public charge, and in the past, it included receiving certain benefits for more than 12 months in a 36-month period. However, in 2021, the government stopped enforcing this rule and instead uses a 1999 Interim Field Guidance that only considers an immigrant a public charge if they are primarily dependent on the government for subsistence, demonstrated by receiving public cash assistance for income maintenance or being institutionalized for long-term care at government expense. This means that receiving Medicaid, public housing, or SNAP benefits will not count against an immigrant in the public charge determination.

A more thorough explanation:

Public charge refers to an immigrant who receives public benefits that could make them ineligible to become a permanent resident. According to the law, any immigrant who is likely to become a public charge at any time is not allowed to enter or stay in the United States.

The United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) has the power to define public charge through regulations. In 2019, a regulation was passed that stated any immigrant who received one or more designated public benefits for more than 12 months within a 36-month period would generally be ineligible to become a permanent resident. However, in 2021, USCIS stopped enforcing this rule and instead applied the 1999 Interim Field Guidance.

The 1999 Interim Field Guidance defines public charge as an immigrant who has become primarily dependent on the government for subsistence, as demonstrated by either the receipt of public cash assistance for income maintenance or institutionalization for long-term care at government expense. This means that USCIS will not consider an applicant's receipt of Medicaid (except for long-term institutionalization at the government's expense), public housing, or Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits as part of the public charge inadmissibility determination.

  • An immigrant who receives food stamps (SNAP) for more than 12 months within a 36-month period may be considered a public charge and ineligible to become a permanent resident under the 2019 regulation. However, under the 1999 Interim Field Guidance, this benefit would not be considered in the public charge determination.
  • An immigrant who is institutionalized for long-term care at government expense may be considered a public charge under both the 2019 regulation and the 1999 Interim Field Guidance.

These examples illustrate how the definition of public charge can vary depending on the regulations in place. It is important for immigrants to understand the current rules and regulations regarding public charge to ensure they are eligible to become permanent residents.

public benefits | public company

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
11ama
20:08
Indeed.
damn how are you guys calculating all these numbers lmao
i'm guessing maybe around 30ish more As then?
if we're being generous
11ama
20:27
@HeadyInvincibleRabbit: Mostly using https://www.lsd.law/download and the 509 repots
11ama
20:28
reeeeeeports*
fml i'm a november applicant that still hasn't heard back
do we know if there are date changes for Rs too? for umich
how come i haven’t heard from some schools w high acceptance rates? what are they up to? like nebraska hasn’t been releasing decisions
is washu done sending out decisions? they just completely ghosted me
11ama
20:33
@SuperficialBlueWeasel: The reality is you are likely behind a gaggle of Sept-Oct. applicants. THe schools are backed up with apps. Some are fast, others are really slow. Also some schools may have had adcoms retire/ shortage of cannonfadder app readers. Try to chill out/research the schools you have applied to so when you get an answer you can move quick and lock up a deal/
thanks @11ama
11ama
20:34
In the event you have not received an admissions decision yet, have you tried turning your computer on and off, have you tried checking your span, and have you ensured your email inbox is not full?
OlDirtyBtard
20:34
I used to come on here and troll people and now I got my first R's and I no longer have a sense of humor
11ama
20:36
I was interested in applying to 'Bama law. Called them up, asked if they had any distant cousins attending their institution based on family name/ Ancestry.con DNA. They did not. I replied I was regrettably no longer interested in their institution.
Are you sure you ever did
OlDirtyBtard
20:36
all i'm saying is, i would debase myself to dean cooper for a cornell A
11ama
20:37
@OlDirtyBtard: Being an asshole is not sufficient for being funny, Unc.
11ama
20:37
Trust me, I tried it many a times b4/
20:39
I wonder if schools are punishing R&R's with no increases to GPA or LSAT.
20:40
Or no new work experience.
20:40
Last cycle people who are too burnt to go get something impressive to add to their resume and application.
11ama
21:00
@JuicyApple: Oh no doubt. Wouldn't you be perturbed if you rejected someone and they came back next year with a 'hey boo, its me again' ?
fedclerkhopeful
21:02
Yeah that’s def a real fear. I think too it puts people who have high stats but are going to reapply in a weird place because you can’t even improve the most important parts of your app
11ama
21:03
I'm sure it falls in the same category as retaking the LSAT: one more thing to be held against you.
21:05
Alrighty then. Sounds bad.
OlDirtyBtard
21:06
nah tbh just reapp to make them say no
OlDirtyBtard
21:06
advance out of spite alone
11ama
21:17
Pretty crazy sheer number of applicants, IMO. I hope people find fulfilling work, yet I fear the future will not reveal said state of affairs since movies/culture makes law seem much more bad ass than it is.
11ama
21:18
Law = paper pusher maxxing, prove me wrong;
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.