Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

public-function test

Read a random definition: unity of art

A quick definition of public-function test:

The public-function test is a legal rule that says if a private person does something that is usually done by the government, their actions can be considered as actions of the government. This rule is used in lawsuits where someone is suing the government for violating their rights. It helps to determine if a private person's actions can be held accountable under the law.

A more thorough explanation:

The public-function test is a legal principle used in cases brought under 42 USCA § 1983. It states that if a private individual or entity performs functions that are typically reserved for the government, their actions can be considered state action and subject to constitutional scrutiny.

For example, if a private prison company is responsible for providing medical care to inmates, and they fail to provide adequate care, they may be held liable under the public-function test. This is because providing medical care to prisoners is a function traditionally performed by the state.

Another example could be a private security company that is hired by a city to provide policing services. If the security company violates someone's constitutional rights while performing their duties, they may be held accountable under the public-function test.

The public-function test is an important tool for ensuring that private entities do not violate individuals' constitutional rights while performing functions that are typically reserved for the government.

public-function rationale | public fund

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:06
it means you will not be rejected today and may be accepted or WL in the future
Just got my Michigan rejection
BookwormBroker
16:10
same
RoaldDahl
16:10
@HopefullyInLawSchool: what if i already got rejected. does it mean anything
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:12
@RoaldDahl: Likely not however it could mean nothing
RoaldDahl
16:15
So if it means nothing does that mean something?
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:17
Possibly
RoaldDahl
16:26
Cool
RoaldDahl
16:26
thank you!!!! i hope it means something
pinkandblue
16:31
fart
IrishDinosaur
16:36
Mich R gang lesgooo
Did anyone else get that random get to know nova email?
HopefullyInLawSchool
17:21
Ya it was sent to all YM applicants
starfishies
17:37
Anyone get the NDLS email inviting you to apply for something even though they haven’t made a decision on your app yet
17:38
Better yet I got the email and I was rejected last month
starfishies
17:38
Wtf
starfishies
17:39
and the deadline is in like a week what is this
any cardozo movement?
BatmanBeyond
18:01
Sent a LOCI via portal, but I'm wondering if email would have gotten me a swifter response
BatmanBeyond
18:02
This whole hold/wait-list/reserve system is a headache
loci already?
BatmanBeyond
18:09
If the odds are like 1-2% I don't think it matters much by the numbers
12:11
I got the same NDLS email
OrangeThing
12:18
I think the user profiles are broken
19:29
Any word out of Notre Dame?
19:29
Only the invitation to apply for LSE
19:29
Anyone received a decision from NDLS?
19:50
when did u guys apply that just heard from umich? they havent even glanced at my app yet
0:30
how am i supposed to spy on people when profile links are broken?
Right. Broken links smh
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.