Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

Pure per stirpes

Read a random definition: protection money

A quick definition of Pure per stirpes:

Pure per stirpes is a way of deciding who gets someone's things when they die without a will. If the person who died has a spouse, the spouse gets some of the things. But if there are kids or grandkids, they get the rest. If one of the kids died before the person who died, that kid's share gets split between their own kids. If a kid died without having any kids of their own, they don't count. But if the person who died didn't have any kids, their things still get split up like they did.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: Pure per stirpes is a way of deciding who gets the property of someone who has died without a will. If the person who died has a surviving spouse, the spouse gets some of the property. The rest of the property is divided among the person's children and their descendants. In the pure per stirpes system, the property is divided into equal parts at the generation closest to the person who died (their children). If one of the children has died, their share is divided equally among their own children (the person who died's grandchildren). If a child who died has no children of their own, their share is ignored. But if the person who died has no living children, the property is still divided at the children's generation instead of skipping to the grandchildren's generation.

Example: John died without a will. He was survived by his wife, Mary, and their two children, Tom and Sarah. Tom had two children, but Sarah had no children. In the pure per stirpes system, Mary gets a share of John's property, and the rest is divided into two parts (one for each child). Since Sarah has no children, her share is ignored. Tom's share is divided equally between his two children. So Mary gets a share, Tom's two children each get a share, and Sarah gets nothing.

Explanation: This example shows how the pure per stirpes system works. The property is divided into equal parts at the children's generation. Since Sarah has no children, her share is ignored. Tom's share is divided equally between his two children. This ensures that each branch of the family gets an equal share of the property.

Purchase-money security interest | put option

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
i've been away for a while what were the most recent waves? any this week?
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.