Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

qualified veto

Read a random definition: sectatoris

A quick definition of qualified veto:

Qualified Veto: A qualified veto is a type of veto where a person or group has the power to reject a decision, but only under certain conditions or circumstances. This means that they cannot simply say "no" to a decision, but must provide a specific reason or justification for their rejection. It is similar to a regular veto, but with additional requirements for its use.

A more thorough explanation:

A qualified veto is a type of veto where the person with veto power can only reject a decision under certain conditions. This means that the veto power is limited and cannot be used arbitrarily.

For example, in the United States, the President has a qualified veto power over legislation passed by Congress. The President can veto a bill, but Congress can override the veto with a two-thirds majority vote in both the House of Representatives and the Senate.

Another example of a qualified veto is in the United Nations Security Council. Any of the five permanent members (China, France, Russia, the United Kingdom, and the United States) can veto a resolution, but only if they believe it is a threat to international peace and security.

These examples illustrate how a qualified veto works by showing that the veto power is not absolute and can only be used under certain circumstances. This helps to prevent abuse of power and ensures that decisions are made through a fair and democratic process.

qualified-terminable-interest property | qualified voter

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
RoaldDahl
16:15
So if it means nothing does that mean something?
HopefullyInLawSchool
16:17
Possibly
RoaldDahl
16:26
Cool
RoaldDahl
16:26
thank you!!!! i hope it means something
pinkandblue
16:31
fart
IrishDinosaur
16:36
Mich R gang lesgooo
Did anyone else get that random get to know nova email?
HopefullyInLawSchool
17:21
Ya it was sent to all YM applicants
starfishies
17:37
Anyone get the NDLS email inviting you to apply for something even though they haven’t made a decision on your app yet
17:38
Better yet I got the email and I was rejected last month
starfishies
17:38
Wtf
starfishies
17:39
and the deadline is in like a week what is this
any cardozo movement?
BatmanBeyond
18:01
Sent a LOCI via portal, but I'm wondering if email would have gotten me a swifter response
BatmanBeyond
18:02
This whole hold/wait-list/reserve system is a headache
loci already?
BatmanBeyond
18:09
If the odds are like 1-2% I don't think it matters much by the numbers
12:11
I got the same NDLS email
OrangeThing
12:18
I think the user profiles are broken
19:29
Any word out of Notre Dame?
19:29
Only the invitation to apply for LSE
19:29
Anyone received a decision from NDLS?
19:50
when did u guys apply that just heard from umich? they havent even glanced at my app yet
0:30
how am i supposed to spy on people when profile links are broken?
Right. Broken links smh
I've been UR since first/second week of Jan, no updates otherwise, is that a bad sign? At or above median LSAT and above 75th gpa.
The profile links are not working for me. anybody else?
13:18
i’m in the same boat mastermonkey but with lower stats. i hope i hear back by mid march
CheeseIsMyLoveLanguage
13:24
@mastermonkey45: Looking at some of the recent decisions in relation to when they went complete, I'd say it's a good sign. It seems many declines were sent within about 5-6 weeks of completion. Given those were applications that were SENT in January, I'd say that means you're still solidly in the running. :)
14:30
Sent an app to OSU in early december and have STILL not heard back
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.