Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

Queen's prison

Read a random definition: intercountry adoption

A quick definition of Queen's prison:

Queen's Prison: A place where people who owed money or committed crimes were sent to be punished. It was built in 1842 in Southwark and replaced three other prisons. It was closed in 1862.

A more thorough explanation:

A prison that was established in 1842 in Southwark. It was used to hold debtors and criminals who were confined under the authority of the superior courts at Westminster, the highest court of admiralty, and the bankruptcy laws. The Queen's Prison replaced the Queen's Bench Prison, Fleet Prison, and Marshalsea Prison. However, it was closed in 1862.

For example, if someone owed a large amount of money and could not pay it back, they could be sent to the Queen's Prison. Additionally, if someone committed a crime that fell under the jurisdiction of the superior courts at Westminster, they could also be sent to the Queen's Prison. The prison was meant to hold those who were considered a threat to society or who had broken the law.

The Queen's Prison was an important part of the criminal justice system in the 19th century. It was a place where debtors and criminals could be held accountable for their actions and where they could be punished for breaking the law. However, the conditions in the prison were often harsh, and many people suffered while they were incarcerated there.

Queen's Counsel | Queen's proctor

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
is there like a cheat sheet or a study guide type of thing for specific forms of questions? I remember I struggled the most with NA/SA/PSA
@soap: if you get above a 175 you should just reapply because you’d probably be competitive for penn nyu and cls at that point with scholly money
I scored 156 on my first LSAT in August, I cancelled that and retook it immediately in September and got 163. Do yall think I can cross into 170's if I start studying from like january to summer
because i've heard that any score increase after 165 is just as hard as from 145 to 160
soap
14:01
I've been told by my parents that I cannot reapply because I have the full ride to UMN and so I better take whatever I can get lol
texaslawhopefully
14:01
I’m going to have to disagree with soap on the point of doing the hardest questions first. I think it’s just a general waste of time to over complicate your strategy. You’re going to have do all the questions anyone. Ignore the clock and focus on one question at a time.
@VolatileClumsyAcolyte: it gets harder to increase your score as you go up, but if you work hard and consistently work on your mistakes it’s entirely possible you break 170
got it thank u guys
@soap: lol oh well just get top 10% a umn and then transfer to harvard because you come from a grade deflated undergrad and law school will be easy for you
soap
14:02
I think the order in which you do questions is a matter of personal preference. In PTs I've always scored better doing the hardest ones first, but that's just because it reduces the stress personally lol
soap
14:02
I guess since I'm paying for all this anyhow I could just wait and reapply lmao
texaslawhopefully
14:03
Yeah soap if you get a 175+, I would 100 percent reapply
hahahahah sure if you’re set on t14 it’s entirely attainable for you
texaslawhopefully
14:03
If your parents aren’t helping at all, they don’t have much of a say
14:08
^valid pt
my mom is so involved in my application proccess she wanted to cater my personal statement to what she believed would make most impact on adcom.
she is helping pay for it but even if so, they shouldnt be too involved
shes a war veteran so she wanted me to spend significant portion of my ps talking about how much her journey affected and inspired me so i ignored her to the fullest by simply saying "ps is about me not you"
speaking of test prep, any 7sage alternatives that include explanations without "youre dumb if u dont get this"
14:25
twitter is making me so mad i may have to get rid of it
texaslawhopefully
14:25
I’m going to get dogged on for saying this, but LSAT Demon has fairly good explanations
14:25
i had demon for a month and they have flushed out written explanations that helpo
14:26
7sage explanations are so sucky i gotta watch a vid of a dude eliminiating an answer choice with 2 seconds of explainaing why
dude, i feel like 7sage guy speedruns thru the whole test.
14:30
the vids are 80% him reading the stimulus out loud then he devotes 4 seconds to each answer choice i swear
14:31
i shake my fist to the sky]
LOL thats so true...they were good for LG but now i dont see the point... applied to GULC mid oct, havent received II or anything, so i HAVE to be cooked, right?
windyMagician
14:35
my parents didn’t know i was applying to law school until i got in. it’s great being old
windyMagician
14:35
my dad barely knows the difference between mich and umn
yeah, my parent thinks cardozo is better than fordham because someone she knows got in fordham LLM and that person is plain stupid so fordham HAS to be bad
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.