Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

quominus

Read a random definition: quod si contingat

A quick definition of quominus:

Term: QUOMINUS

Definition: Quominus is a legal term from Latin that was used in a 14th-century Exchequer writ. This writ was used when a plaintiff had lent money to a defendant and was unable to repay a debt to the Crown because of the debt owed by the defendant. The plaintiff pretended to be a debtor of the king who could not repay the debt because of the defendant's failure to repay him. This fiction was known as the "quo minus" fiction. It allowed citizens to sue in the court of the king to collect a private debt, pretending that the matter concerned the royal revenue. However, everyone recognized this as a mere fiction, and the court did not allow the defendant to bring in other matters, such as a defense on the ground that the plaintiff did not actually owe any taxes to the crown.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: Quominus (kwoh-muh-nuhs or kwoh-mI-nuhs) is a Latin term used in a 14th-century Exchequer writ. It alleges that the plaintiff had lent the defendant a sum of money and that the plaintiff was unable to repay a debt of similar amount to the Crown because of the debt to the defendant. In other words, the plaintiff pleaded the fiction that he was a debtor of the king who could not repay that debt because of the defendant's failure to repay him.

Example: Let's say that John borrowed $100 from Mary and promised to pay her back in a month. However, John also owed $100 to the government as taxes. When the time came to pay Mary back, John didn't have the money because he had to pay his taxes. So, Mary sued John using the writ of quominus, claiming that she was unable to repay her own debt to the government because of John's debt to her.

Explanation: The example illustrates how the writ of quominus was used as a means of collecting the royal revenue. It allowed citizens to sue in the court of the king in order to collect a private debt. The plaintiff had to allege that he was 'less able' to pay the king when his debtors would not pay him. This fiction was used to keep up the pretense that the matter concerned the royal revenue. However, everyone, even the court itself, recognized this as a mere fiction, and that since the suit was in fact between the plaintiff and the defendant, the defendant was not permitted to bring in other matters, such as a defense on the ground that the plaintiff did not actually owe any taxes to the crown.

quo jure | quomodo constat

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 3 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
17:07
i am a 1 issue voter: national debt.
jackfrost11770
17:07
THERES A COP FUNERAL AND NOW THE BUSES ARENT RUNNING TO MY PLACE SO I HAVE TO WALK IN THE FREEZING COLD HOME
texaslawhopefully
17:07
Not to mention that he's completely thrown away liberalism and classic western political philosophy, but yk your eggs will be cheaper so it's worth it
how bad are these tariffs gonna get for us everyday consumers?
@jackfrost11770: FUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUu
jackfrost11770
17:08
FUCK THE NYPD
WASP HAHAHAHAHHA
texaslawhopefully
17:08
Estimates are about 4k fruitbat
YRDSL
17:08
im a 1 issue voter - if i want someone to be elected i vote for them
woof
texaslawhopefully
17:08
I've seen some that could be as high as 7k though
17:08
@jackfrost11770: ya prolly don't buy any lotto tickets tonite
get on that trump coin before the rug pull lol
Dkk
17:09
@BigStrongBug: I don't consider myself a one issue voter but if I had to pick one it would be gender relations.
i am a one issue voter for the economy, which is why i voted harris
texaslawhopefully
17:10
Here's a fairly well respected estimate fruitybat: The proposed tariffs could cost consumers an additional $2,500 to $7,600 a year per household, according to estimates, said Jonathan Gold, vice president of supply chain and customs policy for the National Retail Federation.
i am a voter so i voted
17:11
Lol what does gender relations mean
17:11
Like are you anti gay marriage?
texaslawhopefully
17:11
@Dkk: So you care about gender relations over the Constitution, institutional stability, the economy, political norms, etc.?
blue collar trump voters are gonna blame anything but him anyway when the price of their household consumption goes through the roof. I wonder how they'll spin that narrative.
17:11
Or are you an all inclusive hater and include trans folks too
texaslawhopefully
17:12
Even if you have conservative social values you still shouldn't like Trump lol, but that's a whole diff convo
I love when people prefer putting not talking about gender in schools at the top of the agenda instead of dealing with school shootings
this is going to blow your mind but once you realize women and men are more similar than different you will drown in pussy or dick
17:12
@HopefullyInLawSchool: $45k @ KS is really good. $145k is to attend it is not a bad deal
facts knowledgeable
Also love how he put an EO to leave the Paris climate agreement in the midst of the LA wildfires and places who haven’t gotten snow in 15 years now getting storms
@llama: it would only be 17,000 ish per year
17:15
yeah and i think after 1L u get in state? not certain
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.