Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

recurrent nuisance

Read a random definition: Publish

A quick definition of recurrent nuisance:

Recurrent nuisance is when something keeps happening that bothers people and makes it hard for them to use or enjoy their property. This could be a loud noise or a bad smell that doesn't go away. It can also hurt the land or make it hard to use roads or paths. Sometimes, people can be responsible for causing a nuisance, but not always. It's important to try and fix the problem so everyone can be happy.

A more thorough explanation:

Recurrent nuisance is a type of nuisance that happens repeatedly. A nuisance is a condition, activity, or situation that interferes with the use or enjoyment of property. It can be something like a loud noise or a bad smell that makes it hard to enjoy your property.

For example, if your neighbor has a dog that barks loudly every night, that could be a recurrent nuisance. Or if a factory near your house releases a bad smell every day, that could also be a recurrent nuisance.

Recurrent nuisances can be very frustrating for people who are affected by them. They can make it hard to sleep, work, or enjoy time at home. In some cases, they can even be harmful to people's health.

If you are dealing with a recurrent nuisance, it's important to talk to the person or business responsible for it. They may not realize that their actions are causing a problem, and they may be willing to make changes to address the issue. If that doesn't work, you may need to take legal action to protect your rights.

recuperator | recusable

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
19:24
i cant tell if ppl r just tracking late or actually getting them rolling
we r all lined up, blindfolded, and then the schools shoot people around and near you, and occasionally people out of the line. and u just stand there and wait for ur bullet or ur shoulder tap
19:25
ahhh got it
I think if it's R/WL, more likely big wave hit inboxes and people trickling in to update here last.
A's can be rolling tho
19:25
ok yeah then i dont really need to be refreshing every hour
The UofU has been calling people with admits which is more time consuming than just mass sending that god forsaken email (when will it be my turn)
It’s almost May and that’s making me worried
Its over this cycle
:(
20:28
WL is not R it aint over till its over
20:28
Liar ass mafucka
20:28
Waitlist is R
20:28
um
20:28
ok
20:30
@c0bra1: damn right! - GI Joe
21:14
Don't loose hope frens. It aint over, till its over, brother. -Hoya Saxa
Hey if I am on a bunch of waitlists am I screwed ?
21:39
@AlejandroAI405: Not for certain. You can get off the wait list, however it can be difficult. Would you consider reapplying next year or/and retaking the LSAT? You may drastically increase your choices/outcome(s)/and possibly get a scholarship
stay strong soldiers
10:09
What is up saturday morning gunners
10:09
@llama: RandR is a fucking joke, dont do it alejandro AI lmfao
noreaster
11:06
I genuinely do think being a reapplicant has some influence on a school’s perception of you, like we didn’t want this person before so why would we want them now? If you apply to only a couple schools your first cycle and then reapply with a higher LSAT and apply more broadly you will prob have good odds at the schools you didn’t apply to before
11:24
LMFAO why wait a year to go form UGA to chicago? You make the same biglaw salary lmfao you can get the same elite pi if you finish high, which you should if you are capable of getting chicago with a r and r. This means you advocate them not earning what they could over 4 years - 90k and study then 3 years of law or 3 years of law and then 260k salary? lmfao r and r only makes sense for FC
11:25
If someone applied with a 155 and can get a 170, a lot diff than a 168 hoping for a 172 and wasting a whole year for that
11:25
Oh i know i know i know
11:26
BUt if you want 171 r and r to get a 176+ for top FC at the top schools? okay. Everything else? Take your t25.
11:26
Scholarship dollars? Tuition + 90k income is the same or slightly less than the big law salary, but without a year of career progression.
11:27
It is not a smart move to r and r, long story short, despite what people who want you to pay for essay review and lsat tutor and lsat tutor service say
noreaster
11:58
The other point I would make is that with medians rising your 3.92 GPA might be above median at your dream school one year and below the next
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.