Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

remainder

Read a random definition: renovatio

A quick definition of remainder:

A remainder is a type of ownership in real estate that is given to someone after another person's ownership ends. This can happen when a certain amount of time passes or when someone who was allowed to use the property passes away. The person who gets the remainder must be named in the same document that gave the previous person ownership. There are two types of remainders: vested and contingent. A vested remainder means that someone specific will get the property after the previous person's ownership ends. A contingent remainder means that someone will get the property only if certain things happen first.

A more thorough explanation:

A remainder is a type of future interest in real estate that is transferred to the remainderman or transferee under property law. The remainderman has the right to possess the property at the natural end of a previous property formed by the same instrument. This means that the preceding property must be one that can end naturally, such as when a period of years expires or a life tenant passes away.

A remainder must be included in the same document, such as a deed, that gives the current interest to another person in order for it to be effective. There are two types of remainders in property law: contingent remainders and vested remainders.

A vested remainder is owned by a specified individual and is subject only to the expiration of the preceding property interests. For example, if A grants her brother B the property deed for life, and upon B's death, the land deed to C, B's son, or C's offspring if he does not live. C holds a vested remainder, and his offspring will inherit a "contingent remainder" if C dies before the title passes.

A contingent remainder is one for which the holder has not been identified or for which a condition prior must be met. For example, if A grants her brother B the property deed for life, and upon B's death, the land deed to C, but only if C is married at the time of B's death. In this case, C holds a contingent remainder because the condition of being married has not been met yet.

In summary, a remainder is a future interest in real estate that is transferred to the remainderman under property law. It can be either a vested remainder or a contingent remainder, depending on whether the holder has been identified and whether any conditions must be met before the title passes.

relinquished property | remainder (property law)

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
11:20
Saw a guy that wrote in Biden and he said no retirement for you buddy
1a2b3c4d26z
11:20
@ClockworkBlue: god I hope that's true
if the country was run the same as Mich Law it would be a better place
Imagine if election night was run by an adcom? Like, "yep, we could get the results Friday, or June 2025."
imagine if it was like Berkley applications
1a2b3c4d26z
11:22
Election status: Complete
1a2b3c4d26z
11:22
For months
triplethread
11:23
erection day
soapy
11:23
Shoutout to Robinhood's election bet not resolving until January
triplethread
11:23
is anyone else like certain that trump will win
ambitiouslizard
11:23
he aint winning
triplethread
11:23
i like being a pessimist
ambitiouslizard
11:24
he lost his re-election, why would he win this one?
1a2b3c4d26z
11:25
I have no idea why people have so much beef w berkeley's app
I've been reading a bit about "herding," which is this idea that pollsters are making the race look tied so they look right no matter who wins.
1a2b3c4d26z
11:26
Like... it's a more involved app but you don't have to do it? They're clearly trying to have some self-selection go on
I 100% agree with the self selection, I also am not even close to touching the medians there. However I think the huge PS plus the video and especially the very specific criteria for the why Berkeley essay is pretty crazy
I'm curious, how bold can one be in those videos? Is it worth making a satirical Jason Statham-action short if the adcoms have no sense of humor?
the more risk you take the higher chance of it backfiring
my instinct would be low humor bc if they have such a complex application I would feel hesitant to use a major part of it as a joke. They clearly take their admissions seriously and a joke video might convey the wrong thing at the wrong time. I think that humor is best put into a PS anecdote where it adds some shine to your personality
safe is always better
All good points
triplethread
11:34
@TheAdoptedOne: amazing
I almost did one for Vanderbilt and my idea was to do a documentary-style vid where I and others talked about me like it was an ESPN 30 for 30.
1a2b3c4d26z
11:36
I was risky in maybe one or two of my essays in that some parts read as slightly humorous, but I really tried to suss out the vibe for each school. I feel like Berk and UMich may be more accommodating of a more "out there" approach than other schools I applied to
1a2b3c4d26z
11:37
but that's literally just going off vibes
it looks like Berk vid is in response to a known prompt. My thinking is it may be a counter to AI by getting people to have to respond to what is essentially an essay prompt but on video
"I think really it’s more the USNWR change that emphasizes employment outcomes in school rankings. Schools want to admit people who have the skills to be more likely to land great jobs even more than before, and being a good interviewer is a very important for that. They want to see you have the soft skills." from a reddit comment
1a2b3c4d26z
11:38
One funny thing when talking to lawyers at work is that they will always say how they wish more law schools had interviews to make sure you can like... talk to people and form sentences
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.