Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

restitutory interdict

Read a random definition: DOMA

A quick definition of restitutory interdict:

A restitutory interdict is a type of court order that directs something to be returned to someone who was previously dispossessed of it. It is a way for a judge to restore possession to the rightful owner. This type of interdict is used in Roman and civil law. It is one of several types of interdicts, which are court orders that can be used to prohibit, exhibit, or restore something.

A more thorough explanation:

A restitutory interdict is a type of injunction or decree in Roman and civil law that directs something to be restored to someone who has been dispossessed of it. It is one of several types of interdicts, which are court orders that can be prohibitory, exhibitory, or restitutory.

  • Possessory interdict: A person who has been evicted from their home without due process can obtain a possessory interdict to protect their right to possession. This type of interdict does not depend on title, so even a possessor in bad faith can obtain it. The interdict establishes whether the possessor will be the defendant or the plaintiff in any subsequent claim.
  • Prohibitory interdict: A praetor can issue a prohibitory interdict to forbid someone from doing something. For example, a landlord can obtain a prohibitory interdict to prevent a tenant from damaging the property.
  • Restitutory interdict: A person who has been dispossessed of their property can obtain a restitutory interdict to direct the property to be restored to them. For example, if someone has been wrongfully evicted from their home, they can obtain a restitutory interdict to regain possession of the property.

These examples illustrate the different types of interdicts and how they can be used in different situations to protect someone's rights or prevent harm. A restitutory interdict specifically focuses on restoring something that has been taken away, rather than simply prohibiting or compelling an action.

restitution interest | restitutory right

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
13:34
as far as i know, that information is simply for data collection purposes
^
13:34
i don't think it has a detrimental effect on your chances of admission
13:34
but also you don't need to tell them anything so lol
Can y'all help me understand something lol. What does it mean for an app to "go complete"? Is that when the school has reviewed it and made a decision?
13:35
Na, it's when they have all the required information
Gotcha. So what would be the difference between received and completed?
Does complete entail like the app + LORs?
13:35
correct
That makes sense. Thank you!
13:36
complete basically means they've acknowledged receipt and it's ready to go under review whenever they start the deliberative process
Quillinit
13:40
I still haven't had Chicago or Cornell go complete, but I think that's just how they be
13:41
when did you submit
CaringEquableGuppy
13:42
How do you know when an application is complete? Is it on LSAC or the school's portal?
13:43
it'll be on the school-specific portal
Quillinit
13:44
when they opened
Quillinit
13:45
they both say something along the lines of "received and waiting to be processed"
13:48
anyone have good resources for revising a personal statement for reuse after applying with it last cycle?
13:49
Any guesses when Cornell and Penn CRS fee waivers will go out?
13:51
@Quillinit: from my recollection, chicago and cornell collapse complete/UR1 into a single step, so they may simply not be ready to begin reviewing applications
13:52
i think it's fair to assume, barring a handful of schools like UVA, most schools won't begin reviewing applications in earnest until the beginning of next month at the earliest, so it wouldn't be surprising to hear that applications are just sitting in the queue
13:54
@oakenrays: I was just gonna write a new one personally but I think you want to make it recognizably different from your previous PS
13:56
@baddestbunny: definitely agree that some revision and additional information is warranted but, my why law is the same... I guess just tell the same story in a different way
14:03
ugh fineeee I'll write a new stupid essay
14:07
yeah I told my last essay about a formative experience and am trying to update it now to be about what I’ve learned since that experience
recently wrapped up interview
i re-wrote my PS this cycle when I reapplied
fire drill at work
so lit
Quillinit
15:10
oh fun @info-man, Chicago just changed to complete today, so we'll see
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.