Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

Retirement Equity Act of 1984

Read a random definition: constructive trust

A quick definition of Retirement Equity Act of 1984:

The Retirement Equity Act of 1984 is a law that says if a married couple gets divorced, the pension plan they had together must be divided fairly between them. The person in charge of the pension plan can give some of the money to the ex-spouse if a court says they should. This law helps make sure that both people get what they deserve from the pension plan after a divorce.

A more thorough explanation:

The Retirement Equity Act of 1984 is a federal law that requires private pension plans to follow court-ordered division of a pension between spouses. This law also allows the plan administrator to pay all or part of a worker's pensions and survivor benefits directly to a former spouse if the plan has been served with a court order that meets the federal requirements for a qualified domestic-relations order.

For example, if a couple gets divorced and the court orders that the husband's pension plan should be divided equally between the husband and wife, the Retirement Equity Act of 1984 requires the pension plan to comply with this court order. The plan administrator may also be required to pay a portion of the pension directly to the wife if the court order meets the requirements for a qualified domestic-relations order.

Another example would be if a husband and wife were married for 20 years and the husband worked for a company that had a pension plan. If the couple gets divorced and the court orders that the wife is entitled to a portion of the husband's pension, the Retirement Equity Act of 1984 requires the pension plan to comply with this court order and pay the wife her portion of the pension directly.

These examples illustrate how the Retirement Equity Act of 1984 ensures that spouses are entitled to a portion of their partner's pension in the event of a divorce, and that pension plans must comply with court orders regarding the division of pensions.

retirement annuity | retirement plan

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
That makes sense. Was looking into Cornell clerking stats https://www.lawschool.cornell.edu/careers/judicial-clerkships/
U kno even tho their circuit numbers don't compare to other schools, those #s are better than expected tbh
40-50 fed clerks is pretty cool
texaslawhopefully
20:29
That’s fair. Chicago though: https://www.law.uchicago.edu/clerkships
That's sweet. Again tho, unclear with Fedsoc tho. But u sounded like ur willing to go Fedsoc so ur set
lilypadfrog
20:31
yeah Tex is a fedsoc guy iirc
lilypadfrog
20:31
Is it really like no clerkship benefit at Chicago if you’re not conservative?
lilypadfrog
20:31
that seems crazy #tome
texaslawhopefully
20:32
No, at least from the two people I know there that’s false. I think it’s just something like Chicago for conservatives is on par with S whereas for liberals it’s below HYS but above CCNP
texaslawhopefully
20:32
I mean I think even the student body there only like 15 percent is part of fedsoc
It's more just not a good # for people who aren't willing to clerk conservative. I'm sure they place liberal clerks at an above average rate for a t-6 though. Maybe higher (not entirely sure)
texaslawhopefully
20:34
Page 14 has ideological splits by school: https://scholar.harvard.edu/files/msen/files/law-prof-ideology.pdf
texaslawhopefully
20:35
Chicago/UVA are more to the right but not by an exceedingly large difference
lilypadfrog
20:36
I feel like UVA doesn’t have that reputation the way Chicago does. That’s interesting. Thanks tex
yeah I've heard about uva being conservative
siroracle
20:48
Yeah it’s only 75 percent lib that’s pretty terrifying
Dkk
20:53
lmfao
20:59
@siroracle: funny cause true
@siroracle: don't you have a bridge to be under?
shouldn't you be collecting tolls
21:00
trolololol
atwatodbit
21:04
anyone know much about mich clerking
atwatodbit
21:05
ive tried to learn more about it but its hard to cut through stuff. numbers wise they look good?
21:06
this website is a good research tool for outcomes: https://app.lawhub.org/schools
atwatodbit
21:06
@llama: thanks!
21:06
yah
Dkk
21:10
Anyone else read the Antioch shooters manifesto today. Pretty crazy stuff.
21:14
sad
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.