Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

Reverse discrimination

Read a random definition: annuitant

A quick definition of Reverse discrimination:

Reverse discrimination: This happens when someone who is not part of a minority group says that they have been treated unfairly by someone (like their boss) because the person who is part of a minority group was given special treatment instead.

A more thorough explanation:

Reverse discrimination

Reverse discrimination is when a person who is not a member of a minority group claims that they have been discriminated against by someone, such as an employer, who is a member of a minority group.

Example 1: A white person applies for a job and is not hired because the employer wants to hire a person of color to increase diversity in the workplace. The white person claims that they were discriminated against because of their race.

Example 2: A man applies for a promotion at work but is passed over in favor of a woman because the company wants to increase the number of women in leadership positions. The man claims that he was discriminated against because of his gender.

These examples illustrate reverse discrimination because in both cases, the person who is not a member of a minority group (white person and man) is claiming that they were discriminated against by someone who is a member of a minority group (employer who wants to increase diversity and promote women). Reverse discrimination is controversial because some people believe that it is not possible for a member of a minority group to discriminate against someone who is not a member of a minority group. However, others argue that any form of discrimination is wrong, regardless of who is doing it.

reversal | Reverse engineering

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
texaslawhopefully
22:30
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That all sounds great. It sounds like it has fairly diverse cuisine for a smaller city
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.