Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

rigor mortis

Read a random definition: knock-and-announce rule

A quick definition of rigor mortis:

Rigor mortis is when a person's body becomes stiff after they die. This happens because their joints and muscles become temporarily frozen. It can happen anywhere from 15 minutes to a few hours after death, depending on the person's body and the environment they are in.

A more thorough explanation:

RIGOR MORTIS

Rigor mortis is a natural process that occurs after death, where the body's joints and muscles become temporarily stiff. The onset of rigor mortis can vary from 15 minutes to several hours after death, depending on the body's condition and atmospheric factors.

After a person dies, their body will eventually go through rigor mortis. This means that their limbs and joints will become stiff and difficult to move. For example, if someone dies with their arms outstretched, their arms may remain in that position due to rigor mortis.

Another example of rigor mortis is when a person's jaw becomes locked shut. This can make it difficult for medical professionals to perform certain procedures, such as inserting a breathing tube.

One more example of rigor mortis is when a person's body is found in a seated position, their legs may remain bent due to the stiffness caused by rigor mortis.

Rigor mortis is a natural process that occurs after death, and it can affect different parts of the body in different ways. The examples provided illustrate how rigor mortis can cause the body to become stiff and difficult to move, which can impact medical procedures and the position in which the body is found.

right-to-work law | ringing out

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
texaslawhopefully
22:30
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That all sounds great. It sounds like it has fairly diverse cuisine for a smaller city
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.